Translation and validation of the Tibetan confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit

被引:5
|
作者
Danzeng, Qu-Zhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cui, Na [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Wen-Jun [3 ]
Long, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Deji, Yang-Zong [3 ]
Ze, Cheng [3 ]
Ren, Zeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
[4] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Delirium; Tibet; CAM-ICU; Validation; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; DELIRIUM DIAGNOSIS; DSM-IV; CAM; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; PREDICTOR; VALIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: At present, there is no available delirium translated assessment method for 3.3 million Tibetans. This study aimed to provide a method for delirium assessment for Tibetan patients speaking this language by validating a translation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Methods: The study was conducted between July 2018 and November 2018. Patients were screened for delirium by a neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV). Patients were subsequently screened by two nurses using Tibetan translations of the CAM-ICU. With DSM-IV criterion as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the validity of the CAM-ICU criterion. Interrater reliability was determined by comparing the CAM-ICU ratings of nurse 1 vs. nurse 2 using the kappa coefficient. Results: Ninety-six patients were assessed independently by two nurses and one neurologist. According to DSM-IV standard, 42 out of 96 (43.8%) patients developed delirium. The sensitivities of Tibetan CAM-ICU were 90.5% for nurse 1 and 92.9% for nurse 2, respectively. Their specificities were 85.2% and 90.7%, respectively. The PPV were 82.6% for nurse 1 and 88.6% for nurse 2. Their NPV were 92.0% and 94.2%, respectively. The Tibetan CAM-ICU was done with good interrater reliability between nurse 1 and nurse 2 (kappa = 0.91, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Tibetan CAM-ICU shows good validity and might be incorporated into clinical practice in Tibetan Intensive Care Units.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EVALUATION OF PHARMACIST VS NURSE ASSESSED CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Mackley, Livia
    Catlin, Jennifer
    Derenski, Karrie
    Seratt, Michelle
    Lewis, Amy
    Jones, Kris
    Gunn, Jennifer
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (12)
  • [32] Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist for delirium monitoring? Just do it!
    Miller, Russell R., III
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (06) : 2102 - 2103
  • [33] Detection of delirium by family members in the intensive care unit: Translation, Cross-Cultural adaptation and validation of the Family Confusion Assessment Method for the German-Speaking area
    Greindl, Stephanie
    Weiss, Bjoern
    Magnolini, Raphael
    Lingg, Charlotte
    Mayer, Hanna
    Schaller, Stefan J.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2022, 78 (10) : 3207 - 3216
  • [34] PEDIATRIC DELIRIUM IN INFANTS 0-6 MONTHS OF AGE: VALIDATION OF THE PRESCHOOL CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Fuchs, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 58 (10): : S15 - S15
  • [35] Pediatric Delirium In Infants And Young Children: Validation Of The Preschool Confusion Assessment Method For The Intensive Care Unit (pscam-Icu)
    Smith, H. A. B.
    Gangopadhyay, M.
    Goben, C.
    Chestnut, M.
    Thompson, J.
    Jacobowski, N.
    Savage, S.
    Rutherford, M.
    Acton, M.
    Newman, J.
    Noori, H.
    Terrell, M.
    Williams, S.
    Griffith, K.
    Menser, C.
    Fuchs, D.
    Ely, E. W.
    Pandharipande, P. P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 189
  • [36] Comparing the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit and Neelon and Champagne Confusion Scale for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients
    Locihova, Hana
    Pelikanova, Jana
    KONTAKT-JOURNAL OF NURSING AND SOCIAL SCIENCES RELATED TO HEALTH AND ILLNESS, 2022, 24 (01): : 36 - 42
  • [37] Delirium assessment using Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in Chinese critically ill patients
    Wang, Chunli
    Wu, Ying
    Yue, Peng
    Ely, E. Wesley
    Huang, Jie
    Yang, Xin
    Liu, Yisi
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 28 (03) : 223 - 229
  • [38] Confusion assessment method: Translation and cultural adaptation into Portuguese sub-intensive care settings
    Martins, Sonia
    Simoes, Mario R.
    Fernandes, Lia
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2011, 15 : 31 - 31
  • [39] Assessability And Validation Of Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (icdsc) And The Confusion Assessment Method For Icu (cam-Icu) In A Danish Neuro-Intensive Care Unit
    Larsen, L. K.
    Froekjaer, V. G.
    Nielsen, J. S.
    Skrobik, Y.
    Winkler, Y.
    Moeller, K.
    Petersen, M.
    Egerod, I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [40] Are intensive care nurses really superior to the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) in detecting delirium?
    Spronk, Peter E.
    Riekerk-Grul, Bea
    Hofhuis, Jose G. M.
    CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2012, 14 (01) : 89 - 89