Translation and validation of the Tibetan confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit

被引:5
|
作者
Danzeng, Qu-Zhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cui, Na [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Wen-Jun [3 ]
Long, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Deji, Yang-Zong [3 ]
Ze, Cheng [3 ]
Ren, Zeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
[4] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Delirium; Tibet; CAM-ICU; Validation; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; DELIRIUM DIAGNOSIS; DSM-IV; CAM; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; PREDICTOR; VALIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: At present, there is no available delirium translated assessment method for 3.3 million Tibetans. This study aimed to provide a method for delirium assessment for Tibetan patients speaking this language by validating a translation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Methods: The study was conducted between July 2018 and November 2018. Patients were screened for delirium by a neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV). Patients were subsequently screened by two nurses using Tibetan translations of the CAM-ICU. With DSM-IV criterion as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the validity of the CAM-ICU criterion. Interrater reliability was determined by comparing the CAM-ICU ratings of nurse 1 vs. nurse 2 using the kappa coefficient. Results: Ninety-six patients were assessed independently by two nurses and one neurologist. According to DSM-IV standard, 42 out of 96 (43.8%) patients developed delirium. The sensitivities of Tibetan CAM-ICU were 90.5% for nurse 1 and 92.9% for nurse 2, respectively. Their specificities were 85.2% and 90.7%, respectively. The PPV were 82.6% for nurse 1 and 88.6% for nurse 2. Their NPV were 92.0% and 94.2%, respectively. The Tibetan CAM-ICU was done with good interrater reliability between nurse 1 and nurse 2 (kappa = 0.91, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Tibetan CAM-ICU shows good validity and might be incorporated into clinical practice in Tibetan Intensive Care Units.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Translation and validation of the Tibetan confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit
    Danzeng Qu-Zhen
    Cui Na
    Wang Hao
    Pan Wen-Jun
    Long Yun
    Deji Yang-Zong
    Ze Cheng
    Ren Zeng
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2019, 132 (10) : 1154 - 1158
  • [2] Translation and validation of the Korean confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit
    Eun Young Heo
    Byoung-Jo Lee
    Bong-Jin Hahm
    Eun Hee Song
    Han-A Lee
    Chul-Gyu Yoo
    Young Whan Kim
    Sung Koo Han
    Young-Soo Shim
    Sang-Min Lee
    BMC Psychiatry, 11
  • [3] Translation and validation of the Korean confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit
    Heo, Eun Young
    Lee, Byoung-Jo
    Hahm, Bong-Jin
    Song, Eun Hee
    Lee, Han-A
    Yoo, Chul-Gyu
    Kim, Young Whan
    Han, Sung Koo
    Shim, Young-Soo
    Lee, Sang-Min
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 11
  • [4] Translation, retranslation and validation of the Dutch Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit
    R Vreeswijk
    M Honing
    K Bakker
    P Spronk
    T De Man
    J De Jonghe
    K Kalisvaart
    Critical Care, 12 (Suppl 2):
  • [5] Confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU): translation, retranslation and validation into Swedish intensive care settings
    Larsson, C.
    Axell, A. Granberg
    Ersson, A.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 51 (07) : 888 - 892
  • [6] A Tunisian version of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU): translation and validation
    Imen Ben Saida
    Saiid Kortli
    Badii Amamou
    Nawres Kacem
    Mariem Ghardallou
    Eugene Wesley Ely
    Helmi Ben Saad
    Mohamed Boussarsar
    BMC Psychiatry, 20
  • [7] VALIDATION OF THE CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR INTENSIVE CARE UNIT IN THE ITALLAN CONTENT
    Comisso, I.
    Gaspardo, P.
    Peressoni, L.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 : S304 - S304
  • [8] A Tunisian version of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU): translation and validation
    Ben Saida, Imen
    Kortli, Saiid
    Amamou, Badii
    Kacem, Nawres
    Ghardallou, Mariem
    Ely, Eugene Wesley
    Ben Saad, Helmi
    Boussarsar, Mohamed
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] Detection of delirium in the intensive care unit: Comparison of Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit with Confusion Assessment Method ratings
    McNicoll, L
    Pisani, MA
    Ely, EW
    Gifford, D
    Inouye, SK
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (03) : 495 - 500
  • [10] Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in Older Emergency Department Patients
    Han, Jin H.
    Wilson, Amanda
    Graves, Amy J.
    Shintani, Ayumi
    Schnelle, John F.
    Dittus, Robert S.
    Powers, James S.
    Vernon, John
    Storrow, Alan B.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (02) : 180 - 187