Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic

被引:45
|
作者
Allali, Sid Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Abed, Mohamed [1 ]
Mebarki, Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Saad Dahlab, Dept Civil Engn, BP270, Blida, Algeria
[2] Univ Paris Est, Lab Modeling & Simulat Multiscale, MSME UMR 8205, CNRS, 5 Blvd Descartes, Marne La Vallee, France
关键词
Earthquake; Damage; Assessment; Building; Rule weight; Fuzzy logic; Weighted fuzzy rule; DEFUZZIFICATION; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.055
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present paper develops a methodology based on fuzzy logic for post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage. It derives the global building damage level from that reported information by trained technical staff, after in-situ visual inspection of the main parameters, i.e., the "Structural components" and the "Non-structural components". For illustration purposes, thousands of evaluation forms from post-earthquake survey following the 2003 Boumerdes, Algeria, earthquake (Mw = 6.8) have been collected. According to the standard evaluation form, each component's damage is ranked from D-1 (No damage) up to D-5 (Collapse). The aim is then to derive the global damage level of buildings which should also rank from D-1 to D-5. The paper investigates the effect of the number and weights of fuzzy rules to relate each components' damage level to the global damage level using a single-antecedent weighted fuzzy rule. It investigates also the effect of membership functions values so that it is possible to consider one damage level as the most dominant with highest membership value whereas the rest damage levels are still considered although with lower influence. A genetic algorithm is adopted to optimize the rule weights associated to the components' damage levels. The collected database which covers more than 27,000 buildings is used to train and validate the procedure. The theoretical prediction, obtained by automatic processing of the evaluation form for each building, is compared to the global damage (observed damage) identified by inspectors. Results show that the theoretically-based evaluation Is in accordance with the observed values for 90% of the investigated buildings.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:117 / 127
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rapid damage mapping using post-earthquake satellite images
    Saito, K
    Spence, R
    IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 2272 - 2275
  • [42] Post-Earthquake Rapid Damage Assessment of Road Bridges in Glina County
    Vlasic, Andelko
    Srbic, Mladen
    Skokandic, Dominik
    Mandic Ivankovic, Ana
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [43] A relational database to support post-earthquake building damage and recovery assessment
    Omoya, Morolake
    Ero, Itohan
    Zaker Esteghamati, Mohsen
    Burton, Henry, V
    Brandenberg, Scott
    Sun, Han
    Yi, Zhengxiang
    Kang, Hua
    Nweke, Chukuebuka C.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2022, 38 (02) : 1549 - 1569
  • [44] Probability-based seismic assessment of buildings, considering post-earthquake safety
    Maffei, Joe
    Telleen, Karl
    Nakayama, Yuki
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (03) : 667 - 699
  • [45] Research review: Post-earthquake fire assessment of steel buildings in the United States
    Chicchi, Rachel
    Varma, Amit H.
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 (01) : 138 - 154
  • [46] Exploring the potential of social media crowdsourcing for post-earthquake damage assessment
    Li, Lingyao
    Bensi, Michelle
    Baecher, Gregory
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 98
  • [47] Wireless Monitoring of a Structural Beam To Be Used for Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment
    Ozbey, Burak
    Kurc, Ozgur
    Demir, Hilmi Volkan
    Erturk, Vakur B.
    Altintas, Ayhan
    2018 2ND URSI ATLANTIC RADIO SCIENCE MEETING (AT-RASC), 2018,
  • [48] Post-earthquake reconstruction of residential buildings in historical centers: damage indices of structural aggregates
    Mannella, Antonio
    De Martino, Giuseppina
    Di Ludovico, Marco
    Speranza, Elena
    Provenzano, Salvatore
    Fico, Raffaello
    De Vita, Mariangela
    Dolce, Mauro
    Prota, Andrea
    XIX ANIDIS CONFERENCE, SEISMIC ENGINEERING IN ITALY, 2023, 44 : 1792 - 1799
  • [49] Rapid Post-Earthquake Structural Damage Assessment Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Transfer Learning
    Ogunjinmi, Peter Damilola
    Park, Sung-Sik
    Kim, Bubryur
    Lee, Dong-Eun
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (09)
  • [50] Earthquake damage assessment based on fuzzy logic and neural networks
    Sánchez-Silva, M.
    García, L.
    Earthquake Spectra, 2001, 17 (01) : 89 - 112