A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Performance of Communication Protocols for Process Industry

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Xinyu [1 ]
Mutlu, Ilhan [1 ]
Rani, Fatima [1 ]
Drowatzky, Lucas [2 ]
Urbas, Leon [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Mech Sci & Engn, Dresden, Germany
关键词
Communication Protocols; OPC UA; MQTT; Performance Evaluation; Data Exchange; Industry; 4.0;
D O I
10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998327
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
With the boom of Industry 4.0 for industrial automation, the data exchange between the different industrial devices has tremendously increased through local (edge) and cloud computing. Nowadays, several communication protocols are available to realize data acquisition in the industry. As a result, understanding the practical capabilities of each communication protocol arises as an essential issue in optimizing the data acquisition and storage in industrial plants. This study aims to develop a software-based test environment to evaluate the performance of two widely used communication protocols within the scope of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). These contemplated protocols are Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture (OPC UA) and Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT). With the help of the developed test environment, several performance metrics, like packet overhead, latency, packet loss ratio, and CPU utilization, are evaluated for different application scenarios where the varying number of clients and subscribers are considered. Derived results indicate the stronger parts of each protocol under varying communication configurations.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 177
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The specialized business press and industry-related political communication: A comparative study
    Hollifield, CA
    JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 1997, 74 (04) : 757 - 772
  • [32] A comparative study to evaluate the effect of various postoperative treatment protocols on dry eye and patient satisfaction after phacoemulsification
    Bharucha, Khurshed
    Zanzarukiya, Jatin
    Hegade, Atul
    Deshpande, Rahul
    Shetty, Rakesh
    Deshpande, Madan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (04) : 1638 - 1642
  • [33] A Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols for Tramcars in Mining Industry
    Ding, Weiguo
    Xu, Rui
    Xu, Banggui
    Xiao, Changliang
    Zhao, Liang
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS (ITHINGS) AND IEEE GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (GREENCOM) AND IEEE CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CPSCOM) AND IEEE SMART DATA (SMARTDATA), 2019, : 1148 - 1153
  • [34] A Comparative Study of MANET Routing Protocols
    Alslaim, Mona N.
    Alaqel, Haifaa A.
    Zaghloul, Soha S.
    2014 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-TECHNOLOGIES AND NETWORKS FOR DEVELOPMENT (ICEND), 2014, : 178 - 182
  • [35] Performance of Transport Protocols over satellite communication links
    Muhonen, J
    Durst, RC
    IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 263 - 269
  • [36] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANONYMOUS 802.11 PROTOCOLS
    Qin, Yang
    Yin, Yin
    Huang, Dijiang
    Shah, Nirav
    2008 IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE: MILCOM 2008, VOLS 1-7, 2008, : 3943 - 3949
  • [37] A Comparative Study of Routing Protocols in WSN
    Aznaoui, Hanane
    Raghay, Said
    Aziz, Layla
    Ait-Mlouk, Addi
    2015 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY AND ACCESSIBILITY (ICTA), 2015,
  • [38] Online auction protocols: A comparative study
    Passch, C
    Song, W
    Kou, WD
    Tan, CJ
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 2040 : 170 - 186
  • [39] A Comparative Study of Internet Protocols in MANET
    Singh, Shweta
    Tripathi, Arun Kumar
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTING AND DATA SCIENCES, ICACDS 2016, 2017, 721 : 221 - 231
  • [40] Performance Evaluation of Data Communication Protocols in Intelligent Transportation
    Fallouh, Samer
    Al-Holou, Nizar
    Abdul-Hak, Mohamad
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND APPLICATIONS (ICCA), 2018, : 439 - 443