Are BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation patients underscreened for pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

被引:20
|
作者
Roch, Alexandra M. [1 ]
Schneider, Justine [1 ]
Carr, Rosalie A. [1 ]
Lancaster, William P. [1 ]
House, Michael G. [1 ]
Zyromski, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Nakeeb, Attila [1 ]
Schmidt, C. Max [1 ]
Ceppa, Eugene P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Surg, 545 Barnhill Dr,EH 541, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
breast cancer mutation; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; screening; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CANCER INCIDENCE; RISK; PREVALENCE; FEASIBILITY; MANAGEMENT; BREAST; CYSTS;
D O I
10.1002/jso.25376
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Breast cancer (BRCA) mutations account for the highest proportion of hereditary causes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Screening is currently recommended only for patients with one first-degree relative or two family members with PDAC. We hypothesized that screening all BRCA1/2 patients would identify a higher rate of pancreatic abnormalities. Methods All BRCA1/2 patients at a single academic center were retrospectively reviewed (2005-2015). Pancreatic abnormalities were defined on cross-sectional imaging as pancreatic neoplasm (cystic/solid) or main-duct dilation. Results Two hundred and four patients were identified with BRCA mutations. Forty-seven (40%) had abdominal imaging (20 computerized tomography and 27 magnetic resonance imaging). Twenty-one percent had pancreatic abnormalities (PDAC [n = 2] and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm [IPMN; n = 8]). The prevalence of pancreatic abnormalities and IPMN was higher in BRCA2 patients than in the general population (21% vs 8% and 17% vs 1%; P = 0.0007 and P < 0.0001, respectively), with no influence of family history. Similarly, BRCA1 patients had an increased prevalence of IPMN (8.3% vs 1%; P < 0.0001). Conclusions In this series, 4% and 17% of BRCA2 patients developed PDAC and IPMN, respectively. Eight percent of BRCA1 patients developed IPMN. Under current recommended screening, 60% of BRCA1/2 patients had incompletely pancreatic assessment. With no influence of family history, this study suggests all BRCA1/2 patients should undergo a high-risk screening protocol that will identify a higher rate of precancerous pancreatic neoplasms amenable to curative resection.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 783
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] BRCA1 and BRCA2
    Bertwistle, D
    Ashworth, A
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (16) : R582 - R582
  • [12] Prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Rebbeck, TR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (21) : 100S - 103S
  • [13] What is the real IMPACT of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation?
    Melanie Clyne
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2014, 11 (3) : 124 - 124
  • [14] Prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Rebbeck, TR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 : S15 - S17
  • [15] The Clinical Management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
    Gulati, Anthony P.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2008, 10 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [16] Cardiovascular Concerns in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
    Gast K.C.
    Viscuse P.V.
    Nowsheen S.
    Haddad T.C.
    Mutter R.W.
    Wahner Hendrickson A.E.
    Couch F.J.
    Ruddy K.J.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2018, 20 (2)
  • [17] Clinical management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    S M Domchek
    B L Weber
    Oncogene, 2006, 25 : 5825 - 5831
  • [18] Chemoprevention options for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Eeles, RA
    Powles, TJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (21) : 93S - 99S
  • [19] Clinical management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
    Domchek, S. M.
    Weber, B. L.
    ONCOGENE, 2006, 25 (43) : 5825 - 5831
  • [20] The predictive value of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing
    Bansal, A
    Critchfield, GC
    Frank, TS
    Reid, JE
    Thomas, A
    Deffenbaugh, AM
    Neuhausen, SL
    GENETIC TESTING, 2000, 4 (01): : 45 - 48