A note on stress rotations due to the 2004Mw9.2 Sumatra-Andaman megathrust earthquake

被引:6
|
作者
Silpa, K. [1 ,2 ]
Earnest, Anil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CSIR Fourth Paradigm Inst, Acad Sci & Innovat Res, Wind Tunnel Rd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[2] CSIR Fourth Paradigm Inst, Multiscale Modelling Programme, Wind Tunnel Rd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Subduction zones; megathrust earthquakes; stress rotations; OBLIQUE PLATE CONVERGENCE; TECTONIC STRESS; FOCAL MECHANISMS; POSTSEISMIC DEFORMATION; ISLANDS EARTHQUAKE; JOINT INVERSION; COSEISMIC SLIP; TOHOKU-OKI; SUNDA ARC; FAULT;
D O I
10.1007/s12040-020-01446-5
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Here we study the evolution of stress and its rotations in the Sumatra-Andaman Subduction Zone (SASZ) after the 2004M(w)9.2 megathrust earthquake, using moment tensor stress inversions. Models indicate returning of North Andaman stress regime to the inter-seismic oblique-compression, after a short stint of extension. Likewise, Little Andamans experience extension indicating a trench-ward guidance of extensional stresses. Similarly, Nicobar regime is presently normal-oblique, from early post-seismic reverse-oblique, and North Sumatra experiences pure-reverse regime. The influence of the Wharton Basin stress field and 2012 earthquakes on the SASZ fore-arc deformation is also probed. A near-complete co-seismic stress-relief is observed at Nicobar, followed by North Sumatra and Little Andaman. Co-seismic and post-seismic model comparisons indicate strong correlation with zones of co-seismic stress relief and regions of rapid post-seismic reloading. The North Andaman shows a northward compressive shear than the margin-normal component of subduction, as evident from prominent oblique stress regime with lower co-seismic stress relief and lack of post-seismic back rotations. At Andaman Spreading Ridge (ASR), transition from oblique to extensional stress indicates lateral shear to back-arc spreading enhancement.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low-frequency acoustic-gravity waves from coseismic vertical deformation associated with the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (Mw=9.2)
    Mikumo, Takeshi
    Shibutani, Takuo
    Le Pichon, Alexis
    Garces, Milton
    Fee, David
    Tsuyuki, Takahiro
    Watada, Shingo
    Morii, Wataru
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2008, 113 (B12)
  • [22] Comment on "The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004"
    Neetu, S
    Suresh, I
    Shankar, R
    Shankar, D
    Shenoi, SSC
    Shetye, SR
    Sundar, D
    Nagarajan, B
    SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5753)
  • [23] Seismological aspects of the December 2004 great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake
    Kanamori, Hiroo
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2006, 22 (SUPPL. 3) : S1 - S12
  • [24] Global co-seismic displacements caused by the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (Mw 9.1)
    Guangyu Fu
    Wenke Sun
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2006, 58 : 149 - 152
  • [25] Intraplate Response to the Great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake: A Study from the Andaman Segment
    Andrade, Vanessa
    Rajendran, Kusala
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 101 (02) : 506 - 514
  • [26] Reassessment of earthquake hazard in the Himalaya and implications from the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake
    Thakur, VC
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2006, 90 (08): : 1070 - 1072
  • [27] Viscoelastic relaxation in a heterogeneous Earth following the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake
    Wiseman, Kelly
    Buergmann, Roland
    Freed, Andrew M.
    Banerjee, Paramesh
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2015, 431 : 308 - 317
  • [28] Review of the source characteristics of the Great Sumatra-Andaman Islands earthquake of 2004
    Menke, William
    Abend, Hannah
    Bach, Dalia
    Newman, Kori
    Levin, Vadim
    SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 27 (06) : 603 - 613
  • [29] Intensity distribution from the 2004 M 9.0 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake
    Martin, SS
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2005, 76 (03) : 321 - 330
  • [30] Frequency analysis of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake using spectral seismograms
    Monika Wilde-Piórko
    Seweryn J. Duda
    Marek Grad
    Acta Geophysica, 2011, 59 : 483 - 501