Five-year clinical outcome of the Nobori drug-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with coronary ariery disease: final results of the NOBORI 1 trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chevalier, Bernard [1 ]
Wijns, William [2 ]
Silber, Sigmund [3 ]
Garcia, Eulogio [4 ]
Serra, Antonio [5 ]
Paunovic, Dragica [6 ]
Serruys, Patrick [7 ]
机构
[1] Hop Prive Jacques Cartier, Inst Cardiovasc Paris Sud, F-91300 Massy, France
[2] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
[3] Kardiol Gemeinschaftspraxis & HKL, Munich, Germany
[4] Hosp Monteprincipe, Madrid, Spain
[5] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium
[7] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER; THROMBOSIS; SAFETY; EFFICACY; ARTERIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: To assess the safety and performance of the Nobori drug-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus the TAXUS drug-eluting stent with permanent polymer, in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions. Methods and results: NOBORI 1 was a multicentre, randomised (2:1), prospective, controlled, clinical trial which enrolled 363 patients (238 Nobori and 125 TAXUS) with up to two de novo lesions in two epicardial vessels. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at nine months, while secondary endpoints included safety and efficacy up to five years. At five years, clinical data were available for 350 patients (96%). There were no differences in the composite of death and myocardial infarction (10.9% vs. 11.2%) and target lesion failure (9.2% and 10.4%), while ischaemia- and non-ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisations were less frequent in the Nobori (6.3%) than in the TAXUS arm (16.0%). The rates of stent thrombosis (definite and probable according to the ARC definitions) were 0.0% and 3.2%, in the Nobori and TAXUS stents, respectively (p=0.014). Conclusions: Five years after implantation, the Nobori DES resulted in durable treatment effects with very low TLR and no stent thrombosis. The study was not powered to assess the differences in clinical endpoints. These data are hypothesis-generating.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 554
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Five-year Outcomes in Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Treated with Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Milan Experience
    Magni, Valeria
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Ielasi, Alfonso
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Latib, Azeem
    Godino, Cosmo
    Sharp, Andrew S. P.
    Carlino, Mauro
    Michev, Iassen
    Colombo, Antonio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (6A): : 97D - 97D
  • [22] DESyne novolimus-eluting coronary stent is superior to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent at five-year follow-up: final results of the multicentre EXCELLA II randomised controlled trial
    Iqbal, Javaid
    Verheye, Stefan
    Abizaid, Alexandre
    Ormiston, John
    de Vries, Ton
    Morrison, Lynn
    Toyloy, Sara
    Fitzgerald, Peter
    Windecker, Stephan
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2016, 12 (11) : E1336 - E1342
  • [23] Two-Year Clinical Follow Up of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Restenosis
    Azzarelli, Salvatore
    Amico, Francesco
    Galassi, Alfredo R.
    Giacoppo, Michele
    Argentino, Vincenzo
    Fiscella, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 20 (02): : 62 - 66
  • [24] Five-year clinical outcomes of a 2.25 mm sirolimus-eluting stent in Japanese patients with very small coronary artery disease: final results of the CENTURY JSV study
    Koki Shishido
    Kenji Ando
    Yoshiaki Ito
    Itaru Takamisawa
    Junji Yajima
    Takeshi Kimura
    Kazushige Kadota
    Shigeru Saito
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2023, 38 : 194 - 201
  • [25] Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial
    Natsuaki, Masahiro
    Kozuma, Ken
    Morimoto, Takeshi
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Muramatsu, Toshiya
    Nakagawa, Yoshihisa
    Akasaka, Takashi
    Igarashi, Keiichi
    Tanabe, Kengo
    Morino, Yoshihiro
    Ishikawa, Tetsuya
    Nishikawa, Hideo
    Awata, Masaki
    Abe, Mitsuru
    Okada, Hisayuki
    Takatsu, Yoshiki
    Ogata, Nobuhiko
    Kimura, Kazuo
    Urasawa, Kazushi
    Tarutani, Yasuhiro
    Shiode, Nobuo
    Kimura, Takeshi
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (10)
  • [26] Clinical Outcome, Angiographic Outcome, and Coronary Endothelial Function After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation
    Kaneda, Hideaki
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (15) : 1635 - 1636
  • [27] One year clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent
    Barthelemy, O.
    Helft, G.
    Le Feuvre, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 147 (02) : 307 - 307
  • [28] Randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent with a biolimus-eluting Nobori stent in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and study design of the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome VII trial
    Jensen, Lisette Okkels
    Thayssen, Per
    Maeng, Michael
    Ravkilde, Jan
    Hansen, Henrik Steen
    Jensen, Svend Eggert
    Botker, Hans Erik
    Berencsi, Klara
    Lassen, Jens Flensted
    Christiansen, Evald Hoj
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (02) : 210 - 215
  • [29] Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion
    Zhang, Yuchao
    Wu, Zheng
    Wang, Shaoping
    Liu, Tong
    Liu, Jinghua
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2023, 37 (06) : 1155 - 1166
  • [30] Five-year clinical outcomes following drug-eluting stent implantation in left main trifurcations
    Gil, Robert J.
    Bil, Jacek
    Kern, Adam K.
    Garcia, Luis A. Inigo
    Formuszewicz, Radoslaw
    Dobrzyckis, Slawomir
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2019, 15 (01): : 116 - 119