Market power in renewable portfolio standards

被引:57
|
作者
Tanaka, Makoto [1 ]
Chen, Yihsu [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Grad Inst Policy Studies GRIPS, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1068677, Japan
[2] Univ Calif Merced, Sch Engn, Sch Social Sci Human & Arts, Merced, CA USA
关键词
Market power; Renewable portfolio standards; Renewable energy certificates/credits; Dominant firm-competitive fringe; ENERGY; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Renewable portfolio standard (RPS), which requires a certain percentage of electricity production from renewables, has received considerable attention. One emerging issue is the possibility of strategic behavior in the renewable energy certificate/credit (REC) market, and its spillover effects on the electricity market. This paper develops dominant firm-competitive fringe models that account for market power. We show that market power could have significant impacts on the REC and power prices. In particular, when a nonrenewable generator is a dominant firm and a renewable generator is a competitive fringe, the nonrenewable firm has a strong incentive to lower the REC price, even to zero for avoiding REC costs. The zero REC price would negate price impacts in the power market, thereby mitigating market power of the dominant firm. However, this could lead to an under-investment in renewables in the long run as subsidies received by renewables in form of RECs vanish. Therefore, regulatory agencies need to carefully oversee the market performance to ensure a healthy development of renewable industries under the RPS policies. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of regional greenhouse gas initiative and renewable portfolio standards on power system planning
    Platts, James E.
    [J]. 2006 POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-9, 2006, : 3404 - 3406
  • [22] Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea
    Moon, Ji-Hong
    Lee, Jeung-Woo
    Lee, Uen-Do
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (20) : 9550 - 9557
  • [23] Impact analysis of renewable portfolio standard on retail power market considering quota heterogeneity
    Fu, Chun
    Li, Yanfang
    Giwa, Abdulmoseen Segun
    Luo, Siwei
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (10)
  • [24] Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards
    Sanya Carley
    Lincoln L. Davies
    David B. Spence
    Nikolaos Zirogiannis
    [J]. Nature Energy, 2018, 3 : 754 - 763
  • [25] Assessing the costs and benefits of US renewable portfolio standards
    Wiser, Ryan
    Mai, Trieu
    Millstein, Dev
    Barbose, Galen
    Bird, Lori
    Heeter, Jenny
    Keyser, David
    Krishnan, Venkat
    Macknick, Jordan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [26] Optimal Energy Mix with Renewable Portfolio Standards in Korea
    Geem, Zong Woo
    Kim, Jin-Hong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05):
  • [27] Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards
    Carley, Sanya
    Davies, Lincoln L.
    Spence, David B.
    Zirogiannis, Nikolaos
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (09): : 754 - 763
  • [28] The effects of renewables portfolio standards on renewable energy generation
    Pastor, Daniel J.
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2020, 40 (03): : 2121 - +
  • [29] Strategy for Cross-Provincial Power Transition Under Renewable Portfolio Standards and Carbon Cap
    Xia, Xiang
    Chen, Shenghui
    Gupta, Shivam
    Chen, Mengyao
    Lou, Xingdan
    Wang, Miao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 32 (01)
  • [30] The political economy of renewable portfolio standards in the United States
    Thombs, Ryan P.
    Jorgenson, Andrew K.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 62