Market power in renewable portfolio standards

被引:57
|
作者
Tanaka, Makoto [1 ]
Chen, Yihsu [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Grad Inst Policy Studies GRIPS, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1068677, Japan
[2] Univ Calif Merced, Sch Engn, Sch Social Sci Human & Arts, Merced, CA USA
关键词
Market power; Renewable portfolio standards; Renewable energy certificates/credits; Dominant firm-competitive fringe; ENERGY; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Renewable portfolio standard (RPS), which requires a certain percentage of electricity production from renewables, has received considerable attention. One emerging issue is the possibility of strategic behavior in the renewable energy certificate/credit (REC) market, and its spillover effects on the electricity market. This paper develops dominant firm-competitive fringe models that account for market power. We show that market power could have significant impacts on the REC and power prices. In particular, when a nonrenewable generator is a dominant firm and a renewable generator is a competitive fringe, the nonrenewable firm has a strong incentive to lower the REC price, even to zero for avoiding REC costs. The zero REC price would negate price impacts in the power market, thereby mitigating market power of the dominant firm. However, this could lead to an under-investment in renewables in the long run as subsidies received by renewables in form of RECs vanish. Therefore, regulatory agencies need to carefully oversee the market performance to ensure a healthy development of renewable industries under the RPS policies. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Power Market Model with Renewable Portfolio Standards, Green Pricing and GHG Emissions Trading Programs
    Chen, Yihsu
    Wang, Lizhi
    [J]. 2008 IEEE ENERGY 2030 CONFERENCE, 2008, : 51 - +
  • [2] Renewable Portfolio Standards
    Feldman, Rachel
    Levinson, Arik
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (05): : 1 - 20
  • [3] Impact of market design on cost-effectiveness of renewable portfolio standards
    Shayegh, Soheil
    Sanchez, Daniel L.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 136
  • [4] Market and welfare effects of renewable portfolio standards in United States electricity markets
    Bhattacharya, Suparna
    Giannakas, Konstantinos
    Schoengold, Karina
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 : 384 - 401
  • [5] Funding renewable energy: An analysis of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 66 : 205 - 216
  • [6] The Other Renewable: Hydropower Upgrades and Renewable Portfolio Standards
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    Mauritzen, Johannes
    Ullrich, Carl J.
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (02): : 197 - 217
  • [7] Renewable energy potential and adoption of renewable portfolio standards
    Upton, Gregory B., Jr.
    Snyder, Brian F.
    [J]. UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 36 : 67 - 70
  • [8] Drivers and Impacts of Renewable Portfolio Standards
    Lyon, Thomas P.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 8, 2016, 8 : 141 - 155
  • [9] Is the choice of renewable portfolio standards random?
    Huang, Ming-Yuan
    Alavalapati, Janaki R. R.
    Carter, Douglas R.
    Langholtz, Matthew H.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (11) : 5571 - 5575
  • [10] Renewable portfolio standards and electricity prices
    Lee, Kangoh
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 126