Container shipping operational risks: an overview of assessment and analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Nguyen, Son [1 ]
Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling [1 ]
Du, Yuquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Australian Maritime Coll, Natl Ctr Ports & Shipping, Launceston, Tas, Australia
关键词
Risk assessment; risk analysis; container supply chain; operational risk; container shipping;
D O I
10.1080/03088839.2021.1875142
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The interdependence of container shipping operations (CSOs) creates a hotbed of multiple operational risks. Risk analysis and assessment (RAA) is, therefore, a growing research focus on container shipping policy and management. Currently, it is challenging to grasp a state-of-the-art understanding of the field due to the fragmentation of the central concepts and overlapping taxonomies. This critical review paper clearly indicates this fragmentation by an overarching framework to cover both CSO and RAA aspects. The results revealed the attention toward ports and container shipping companies as the primary subjects of research; and Asia-Pacific and Europe as the fruitful regions of empirical studies. Thirty-five typical information, physical, and financial risks were identified in various CSOs. Regarding the CSO aspect, besides more empirical applications of RAA models, approaches and methods to support the collaborative mitigation and prevention efforts are considered critical tasks of the field, especially in the upcoming era of digitalization in container shipping. Regarding the RAA aspect, the establishment of a common framework that acknowledges uncertainty as a core component of risk is necessary to support the CSO aspect in dealing with emerging issues.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 299
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Operational Readiness of the ES-3100 Type B Shipping Container for Fissile Materials
    Arbital, Jeffrey G.
    Sanders, Kenneth E.
    [J]. ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, VOL 7: OPERATIONS, APPLICATIONS AND COMPONENTS, 2010, : 117 - 124
  • [32] Managing Operational and Environmental Risks in the Strategic Plan of a Maritime Container Port
    Gacek, Christopher G.
    Gimbel, Derek J.
    Longo, Samuel J.
    Mendel, Benjamin, I
    Sampaio, Gabriel N.
    Polmateer, Thomas L.
    Manasco, Mark C.
    Hendrickson, Daniel C.
    Eddy, Timothy L., Jr.
    Lambert, James H.
    [J]. 2021 SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING DESIGN SYMPOSIUM (IEEE SIEDS 2021), 2021, : 12 - 17
  • [33] Research and Analysis Container Shipping Line on the Basis of Simulation
    Fetisov, Vladimir A.
    Maiorov, Nikolaj N.
    [J]. NASE MORE, 2015, 62 (02): : 59 - 66
  • [34] The Importance of Customer Expectations: An Analysis of CSR in Container Shipping
    Lijun Tang
    Victor Gekara
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 165 : 383 - 393
  • [35] Scenario analysis for supply chain integration in container shipping
    Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee
    van de Voorde, Eddy
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2011, 38 (07) : 705 - 725
  • [36] Risk analysis for container shipping: from a logistics perspective
    Chang, Chia-Hsun
    Xu, Jingjing
    Song, Dong-Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 26 (01) : 147 - 171
  • [37] Evaluation, modeling, and analysis of shipping container building structures
    Giriunas, Kevin
    Sezen, Halil
    Dupaix, Rebecca B.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 43 : 48 - 57
  • [38] NETWORK DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS OF CONTAINER SHIPPING LINES
    Lozano, S.
    Gutierrez, E.
    Furio, S.
    Salmeron, J. L.
    [J]. 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARBOR, MARITIME AND MULTIMODAL LOGISTICS MODELLING AND SIMULATION (HMS 2012), 2012, : 140 - 145
  • [39] Failure Analysis of Shipping Container Handler Twistlock Pin
    Kral, M., V
    Beardsley, A. L.
    Breeuwer, N. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 20 (03) : 641 - 646
  • [40] Failure Analysis of Shipping Container Handler Twistlock Pin
    M. V. Kral
    A. L. Beardsley
    N. J. Breeuwer
    [J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2020, 20 : 641 - 646