Scenarios for Australian agricultural production and land use to 2050

被引:40
|
作者
Grundy, Michael J. [1 ]
Bryan, Brett A. [2 ]
Nolan, Martin [2 ]
Battaglia, Michael [3 ]
Hatfield-Dodds, Steve [4 ]
Connor, Jeffery D. [2 ]
Keating, Brian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, EcoSci Precinct, Dutton Pk, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Sandy Bay, Tas 7001, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Futures; Australia; Intensification; Cropping; Food security; Climate change; Global change; Carbon sequestration; Modelling; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; DEEP UNCERTAINTY; BILLION PEOPLE; FOOD SECURITY; GLOBAL CHANGE; USE DYNAMICS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.008
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Australian agricultural land use and production have evolved within an economic and environmental context that may change substantially in terms of productivity rates, resource scarcity and degradation, greenhouse gas abatement policy, climate change, and global demand. We used an integrated systems modelling approach to explore the response of Australian land use and agricultural production to these changes from 2013 to 2050. We found potentially large transitions in spatial and temporal patterns of land use, agricultural production, output rates, and profitability. New land uses such as carbon plantings, biofuels and bioenergy, and environmental plantings competed with food and fibre production, reducing its area. Global outlooks, including the strength of action on climate change and population assumptions, had a strong influence. Capacity constraints and adoption inertia reduced and delayed land use change. Agricultural production and land use were sensitive to productivity assumptions. Despite the competition for land from new land uses, agricultural production increased under most settings, with greatest impact from land use transitions concentrated on livestock production. Agricultural profits also increased under most settings due to higher prices and output rates. Negligible land use change was observed with carbon payments below $50 per tCO(2)-e, and significant change did not occur before 2030 in any but the unconstrained, high-abatement scenarios. We conclude that transformative land use change is plausible but high levels of food/fibre production can co-exist with non-food land uses motivated by market responses to global change and domestic policy. Thereby, the Australian land sector can continue its significant contribution to global food security while responding to new economic opportunities. Policy settings can influence these outcomes through reducing infrastructure constraints, strategies for enhancing adoption, and research and development in agricultural technology and productivity. Due to the long time frames required to change attitudes and land use and management practices, consideration of the possible impacts of global change on agriculture and potential policy responses is timely. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 83
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing Australian public and farmer views on agricultural land use and management practices for sustainability
    Dumbrell, Nikki P.
    Wheeler, Sarah Ann
    Zuo, Alec
    Adamson, David
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 219
  • [32] Future scenarios of European agricultural land use II. Projecting changes in cropland and grassland
    Rounsevell, MDA
    Ewert, F
    Reginster, I
    Leemans, R
    Carter, TR
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 107 (2-3) : 117 - 135
  • [33] Spatial determinants and future land use scenarios of Paragominas municipality, an old agricultural frontier in Amazonia
    Osis, Reinis
    Laurent, Francois
    Poccard-Chapuis, Rene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE, 2019, : 258 - 279
  • [34] BIOMASS PRODUCTION ON AGRICULTURAL LAND
    GOSSE, G
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD CONTRACTORS MEETING, 1989, 4 : 5 - 8
  • [35] A Modelling Solution for Developing and Evaluating Agricultural Land-Use Scenarios in Water Scarcity Contexts
    Clavel, Lucie
    Charron, Marie-Helene
    Therond, Olivier
    Leenhardt, Delphine
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2012, 26 (09) : 2625 - 2641
  • [36] Valuation of agricultural land-use scenarios with choice experiments: a political market share approach
    Huber, Robert
    Hunziker, Marcel
    Lehmann, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 54 (01) : 93 - 113
  • [37] Cost-effective use of abandoned agricultural land for biofuel production
    Nordin, Ida
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2024, 16 (07):
  • [38] THE ELASTICITY OF SUBSTITUTION AND LAND-USE IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION - A CAUSE FOR OPTIMISM
    LUTTON, T
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 1984, 36 (03): : 20 - 27
  • [39] Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agricultural production and land use
    Banse, Martin
    van Meijl, Hans
    Tabeau, Andrzej
    Woltjer, Geert
    Hellmann, Fritz
    Verburg, Peter H.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (06): : 2385 - 2390
  • [40] Simulated Atmospheric Response to Four Projected Land-Use Land-Cover Change Scenarios for 2050 in the North-Central United States
    Flanagan, Paul Xavier
    Mahmood, Rezaul
    Sohl, Terry
    Svoboda, Mark
    Wardlow, Brian
    Hayes, Michael
    Rappin, Eric
    [J]. EARTH INTERACTIONS, 2021, 25 (01) : 177 - 194