Using participatory action research to build a priority setting process in a Canadian Regional Health Authority

被引:19
|
作者
Patten, San
Mitton, Craig
Donaldson, Cam
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Ctr Hlth & Policy Studies, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] British Columbia Res Inst Childrens & Womens Hlth, Ctr Healthcare Innovat & Improvement, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
[4] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Sch Populat & Hlth Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AA, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch Econ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AA, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
priority setting; participatory action research; health economics; Canada;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.033
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Due to resource scarcity, every health system worldwide must decide what services to fund, and conversely, what services not to fund. In order to institute and refine a macro-level priority setting framework within a large, urban health authority in Alberta, Canada, researchers and decision makers together embarked on a participatory action research (PAR) project. The focus of this paper is the PAR process in this context, including reflections from PAR participants about the contribution of the research methodology to their own practice as health care managers and clinicians. The use of qualitative research in health economics-in this case, to refine the application of a macro-level priority setting model-is a relatively new advancement. PAR proved to be an appropriate and helpful approach to introducing a theoretically driven model of macro-level priority setting within a large, complex health organization. However, it is important that support for the change is sustained as long as necessary to embed the new practices into the organization. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1134
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Priority setting and health policy and systems research
    Ranson M.K.
    Bennett S.C.
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 7 (1)
  • [22] Priority setting for mental health research in Chile
    Pedro Zitko
    Francesca Borghero
    Cynthia Zavala
    Niina Markkula
    Emilio Santelices
    Nicolás Libuy
    Alfredo Pemjean
    International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 11
  • [23] The application of evidence-based priority setting in a District Health Authority
    Dixon, S
    Booth, A
    Perrett, K
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1997, 19 (03): : 307 - 312
  • [24] A Most Unlikely Union: Conducting Participatory Action Research in a Canadian Forensic Mental Health Hospital
    Livingston, Jamie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2013, 12 : 793 - 793
  • [25] Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process
    Luz Isabel Romero
    Cristiane Quental
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 12
  • [26] Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process
    Romero, Luz Isabel
    Quental, Cristiane
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2014, 12
  • [27] Using the Delphi Method for Qualitative, Participatory Action Research in Health Leadership
    Fletcher, Amber J.
    Marchildon, Gregory P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2014, 13 : 1 - 18
  • [28] Using Youth Participatory Action Research as a Health Intervention in Community Settings
    Lindquist-Grantz, Robin
    Abraczinskas, Michelle
    HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (04) : 573 - 581
  • [29] ADDRESSING YOUTH HEALTH CHALLENGES USING PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
    Robertson, L. J.
    Dumont, G.
    Junker, A.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 62 (01) : 215 - 215
  • [30] Colonoscopy and its complications across a Canadian regional health authority
    Singh, Harminder
    Penfold, Robert B.
    DeCoster, Carolyn
    Kaita, Lisa
    Proulx, Cindy
    Taylor, Gerry
    Bernstein, Charles N.
    Moffatt, Michael
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (03) : 665 - 671