Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility: Methodology for the EXCLAIM study

被引:73
|
作者
Hull, Russell D.
Schellong, Sebastian M.
Tapson, Victor F.
Monreal, Manuel
Samama, Meyer-Michel
Turpie, Alexander G. G.
Wildgoose, Peter
Yusen, Roger D.
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Foothills Hosp, Thrombosis Res Unit, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[2] Univ Klinikum Carl Gustav Carus Med Klin & Polikl, Dresden, Germany
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[4] Hosp Badalona Germans Trias & Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Serv Hematol Biol, Paris, France
[6] McMaster Univ, HHSC McMaster Clin, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Sanofi Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[8] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
medical patients; low-molecular-weight heparin; prophylaxis; venous thromboembolism;
D O I
10.1007/s11239-006-7732-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in medical patients. Although thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin reduces the risk of VTE in these patients, the optimal duration of therapy is not currently known. The EXCLAIM (EXtended CLinical prophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical patients) study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin with the standard regimen of enoxaparin in acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility. Methods: All enrolled acutely ill medical patients receive enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily for 10 +/- 4 days. Eligible patients are then randomized in a blinded manner to receive either extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily or placebo subcutaneously once daily for an additional 28 +/- 4 days. The primary efficacy endpoint is the incidence of VTE during the 28 +/- 4 days after randomization. This study utilizes a standardized bilateral compression ultrasonography examination protocol that consists of an intensive interrogation of the deep veins of the lower extremities for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. The secondary efficacy endpoints are the rate of symptomatic VTE during the 3 months after randomization and mortality at 3 and 6 months after enrollment. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of major hemorrhagic complications during the 28 +/- 4 days after randomization. Results: To date, 3,983 patients, with a broad range of medical conditions, have been included in the study. Almost one third of the enrolled patients with reduced mobility are acutely ill due to respiratory insufficiency and one third have infectious diseases. Conclusions: The EXCLAIM study is designed to show the efficacy and safety of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis using enoxaparin in acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility, which may potentially lead to a reduction in the incidence of late VTE events in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extended-duration enoxaparin reduced VTE but increased major bleeding in patients with acute medical illness
    Gallus, Alexander
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 153 (10)
  • [42] EXTENDED-DURATION VERSUS STANDARD-DURATION OSELTAMIVIR IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH INFLUENZA
    Kiser, Tyree
    Burnham, Ellen
    Ho, Michael
    Moss, Marc
    Vandivier, R.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 316 - 316
  • [43] Extended-Duration Betrixaban Reduces the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism-Related Rehospitalization Among Acutely Ill Hospitalized Medical Patients: An APEX Trial Substudy
    Chi, Gerald
    Nafee, Tarek
    Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Hull, Russell D.
    Gold, Alex
    Korjian, Serge
    Daaboul, Yazan
    Cohen, Alexander T.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Gibson, C. Michael
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [44] Another good reason for not ignoring thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients
    Ageno, W
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2004, 2 (11) : 1889 - 1891
  • [45] Standard or extended-duration prophylaxis in medical patients? A review of the evidence
    J. E. Stark
    W. J. Smith
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2011, 32
  • [46] Standard or extended-duration prophylaxis in medical patients? A review of the evidence
    Stark, J. E.
    Smith, W. J.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2011, 32 (03) : 318 - 327
  • [47] Rivaroxaban and Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical Patients with History of Cancer: Insights from the Magellan and Mariner Studies
    Spyropoulos, Alex C.
    Lipardi, Concetta
    Cohen, Alexander T.
    Vuckovic, Biljana
    Xu, Jianfeng
    Lu, Wentao
    Spiro, Theodore E.
    Barnathan, Elliot S.
    Raskob, Gary E.
    BLOOD, 2019, 134
  • [48] Extended-Duration Betrixaban Reduces the Risk of Rehospitalization Associated With Venous Thromboembolism Among Acutely Ill Hospitalized Medical Patients Findings From the APEX Trial (Acute Medically Ill Venous Thromboembolism Prevention With Extended Duration Betrixaban Trial)
    Chi, Gerald
    Yee, Megan K.
    Amin, Alpesh N.
    Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Hull, Russell D.
    Cohen, Alexander T.
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Gibson, C. Michael
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 137 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [49] COMPARISON OF ENTERAL CLONIDINE TO WEAN EXTENDED-DURATION DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Bonnin, Sophia
    Albrecht, Gale
    Dionne, Catherine
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 455 - 455
  • [50] Effectiveness of an Admission Proforma in Improving Prescription of Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely ill Medical Patients
    McMahon, D.
    Kelly, T.
    Saies, A.
    Spence, C.
    Watts, M.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S219 - S220