Effects of Environmental Regulation on Economic Activity and Pollution in Commercial Agriculture

被引:0
|
作者
Sneeringer, Stacy E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wellesley Coll, Wellesley, MA 02181 USA
来源
关键词
livestock; externality; regulation; public health; CLEAN-AIR ACT; HOG PRODUCTION; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH; MATTER; WATER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research empirically estimating the effects of regulation on economic activity is largely focused on manufacturing, while generally overlooking one of the major polluters in the U.S. - commercial agriculture. Further, the prior literature generally does not estimate the pollution effects associated with regulation, making it difficult to assess the relative social costs and benefits of government action. This article considers a specific set of state policies to examine the results of environmental regulations in the agricultural sector, providing estimates of the magnitude of effects on production as well as pollution. During the 1990's, North Carolina's hog production more than tripled after passage of welcoming state legislation. I find that North Carolina's laws led to an additional 11% increase per year in pork industry presence in North Carolina relative to the rest of the U.S., as well as a 10% increase per county per year in ambient air pollution. Through a series of falsification tests and examinations of alternative hypotheses, I conclude that the air pollution is attributable to the industry; a doubling of production yields a 92% increase in ambient air pollution. The magnitude of the changes in air pollution is large enough to result in significant public health effects, totaling in cost to at least 12% of North Carolina's hog production revenue.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agricultural pollution and regulation: How to subsidize agriculture?
    Chen, You-hua
    Wen, Xiao-wei
    Wang, Bo
    Nie, Pu-yan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 258 - 264
  • [22] Economic instruments and environmental policy in agriculture
    Weersink, A
    Livernois, J
    Shogren, JF
    Shortle, JS
    CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 1998, 24 (03): : 309 - 327
  • [23] ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN AGRICULTURE
    Horhota, L.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2012, 13 (02): : 811 - 815
  • [24] ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATION OF AGRICULTURE
    GARDNER, BL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (04) : 732 - 740
  • [25] The Effects of Economic Growth and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmental Pollution in Turkey
    Canbay, Serif
    MALIYE DERGISI, 2019, (176): : 140 - 151
  • [26] Getting into the details: structural effects of economic growth on environmental pollution in Ethiopia
    Tenaw, Dagmawe
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (07)
  • [27] ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION OF AGRICULTURE IN ARIZONA
    MUNSON, BE
    RUSSELL, C
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1990, 45 (02) : 249 - 252
  • [28] Characteristics of environment system and the condition of environmental pollution and their effects on the agriculture and industry in Jiangsu province
    Huang, Jinsong
    Zhou, Yinkang
    Peng, Buzhuo
    Lu, Youru
    Changjiang Liuyu Ziyuan Yu Huanjing/Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Valley, 7 (04): : 364 - 369
  • [29] Assessing the economic and environmental effects of environmental regulation in China: The dynamic and spatial perspectives
    Zhang, Huan
    Liu, Zhao
    Zhang, Yue-Jun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 334
  • [30] Effects of environmental enrichment on activity and lameness in commercial broiler production
    Vasdal, Guro
    Vas, Judit
    Newberry, Ruth C.
    Moe, Randi Oppermann
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2019, 22 (02) : 197 - 205