Trends and Impact of the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

被引:11
|
作者
Napierkowski, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Banerjee, Upasana [1 ]
Anderson, H. Vernon [1 ,2 ]
Charitakis, Konstantinos [1 ,2 ]
Madjid, Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
Smalling, Richard W. [1 ,2 ]
Dhoble, Abhijeet [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Texas Med Ctr, Mem Hermann Heart & Vasc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
关键词
EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE-SUPPORT; STRESS CARDIOMYOPATHY; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; CLINICAL-FEATURES; TAKO-TSUBO; INFECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Data on the trend and impact of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) are scarce. We evaluated the incidence and outcomes of cardiogenic shock (CS) in TC patients and the trend in use of MCS over time. The National Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014 was used to identify patients admitted with TC and those receiving MCS. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of mortality. The Cochran-Armitage test was used for the trend analysis across the years. Admissions for TC showed a linear increase for the study period. From 2005 to 2014 the proportion of TC managed with MCS remained stable, with some yearly fluctuations. Crude in-hospital mortality rate was 2.5% in the patients admitted with TC but was significantly higher in those with CS (15.81% vs 1.68%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality in TC patients with CS, both with and without the use of MCS. However, patients managed with MCS were more likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (31% vs 25.55, p = 0.015) compared with TC patients with CS who were medically managed. The cost of care for patients with TC and CS, managed with MCS was significantly higher than those managed medically ($171K vs $128K, p <0.001). In patients managed with MCS, only sepsis was associated with a higher likelihood of death using multivariate analysis (Odds Ratio 2.538, Confidence Interval 1.245 to 5.172; p = 0.011). In conclusion, the incidence of TC has increased over the years, but the proportion of patients requiring MCS has declined. Crude mortality rate for TC was 2.5%, but was 15.8% in the TC patients with CS. The use of MCS did not lead to improved mortality but was associated with higher cost and increased likelihood of skilled nursing facility discharge. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 33
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Osman, Mohammed
    Elsisy, Mohamed Farouk A.
    Kawsara, Akram
    Berzingi, Chalak O.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (02)
  • [22] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock patients
    Martin-Villen, Luis
    Gomez, Alejandro Adsuar
    Jimenez, Jose Manuel Garrido
    Vela, Jose Luis Perez
    Cabanes, Maria Paz Fuset
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2024, 48 (12) : 714 - 727
  • [23] Early Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
    Upadhrasta, Sireesha
    Museedi, Abdulrahman
    Thannoun, Tariq
    Chaanine, Antoine H.
    Le Jemtel, Thierry H.
    CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2023, 31 (04) : 215 - 218
  • [24] Peripartum Cardiogenic Shock and Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Botti, Giulia
    Thirunavukarasu, Sharmaine
    Ziviello, Francesca
    Chieffo, Alaide
    INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY-REVIEWS RESEARCH RESOURCES, 2023, 18
  • [25] Cardiogenic Shock and Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Khalif, Adnan
    DuMont, Tiffany
    Ranganathan, Karthikeyan
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2022, 45 (03) : 218 - 224
  • [26] Evidence for Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock
    Bloom, Jason E.
    Hyasat, Kais
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 10 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [27] Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
    Mohamad Alkhouli
    Mohammed Osman
    Mohamed Farouk A. Elsisy
    Akram Kawsara
    Chalak O. Berzingi
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2020, 22 (2)
  • [28] Mechanical circulatory support in the treatment of cardiogenic shock
    Fernando, Shannon M.
    Price, Susanna
    Mathew, Rebecca
    Slutsky, Arthur S.
    Combes, Alain
    Brodie, Daniel
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 28 (04) : 434 - 441
  • [29] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock
    Touchan J.
    Guglin M.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2017, 19 (10)
  • [30] Mechanical Circulatory Support for AMI and Cardiogenic Shock
    Abu-Omar, Yasir
    Tsui, Steven S. L.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2010, 25 (04) : 434 - 441