Obligations of trust for privacy and confidentiality in distributed transactions

被引:2
|
作者
Mbanaso, U. M. [1 ]
Cooper, G. S. [1 ]
Chadwick, David [2 ]
Anderson, Anne [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, IRIS, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Kent, Comp Lab, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] Sun Microsyst Inc, Burlington, MA USA
关键词
Trust; Privacy; Distributed parameter control systems; Data security;
D O I
10.1108/10662240910952328
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to describe a bilateral symmetric approach to authorization, privacy protection and obligation enforcement in distributed transactions. The authors introduce the concept of the obligation Of trust (OoT) protocol as a privacy assurance and authorization mechanism that is built upon the XACML standard. The OoT allows two communicating pal-ties to dynamically exchange their privacy and authorization requirements and capabilities, which the authors term a notification of obligation (NoB), as well as their commitments to fulfilling each other's requirements, which the authors term signed acceptance of obligations (SAO). The authors seek to describe some applicability of these concepts and to show how they can be integrated into distributed authorization systems for stricter privacy and confidentiality control. Design/methodology/approach - Existing access control and privacy protection systems are typically unilateral and provider-centric, in that the enterprise service provider assigns the access rights, makes the access control decisions, and determines the privacy policy. There is no negotiation between the client and the service provider about which access control or privacy policy to use. The authors adopt a symmetric, more user-centric approach to privacy protection and authorization, which treats the client and service provider as peers, in which both can stipulate their requirements and capabilities, and hence negotiate terms which are equally acceptable to both parties. Findings - The authors demonstrate how the obligation of trust protocol can be used in a number of different scenarios to improve upon the mechanisms that are currently available today. Practical implications - This approach will serve to increase trust in distributed transactions since each communicating party receives a difficult to repudiate digitally signed acceptance of obligations, in a standard language (XACML), which can be automatically enforced by their respective computing machinery. Originality/value - The paper adds to current research in trust negotiation, privacy protection and authorization by combining all three together into one set of standardized protocols. Furthermore, by providing hard to repudiate signed acceptance of obligations messages, this strengthens the legal case of the injured party should a dispute arise.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 173
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Data privacy and confidentiality
    Mann, RD
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 1999, 8 (04) : 245 - 245
  • [32] PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY IN PSYCHOTHERAPY
    EVERSTINE, L
    EVERSTINE, DS
    HEYMANN, GM
    TRUE, RH
    FREY, DH
    JOHNSON, HG
    SEIDEN, RH
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (09) : 828 - 840
  • [33] PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY RESOURCES
    Zayatz, Laura
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2009, 4 (03) : 33 - 34
  • [34] PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY
    CURRAN, WJ
    LASKA, EM
    KAPLAN, H
    BANK, R
    SCIENCE, 1973, 182 (4114) : 797 - 802
  • [35] A taxonomy on privacy and confidentiality
    Nunes, Jose Benardi S.
    Brito, Andrey
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 11TH LATIN-AMERICAN SYMPOSIUM ON DEPENDABLE COMPUTING, LADC 2022, 2022, : 1 - 10
  • [36] FETAL PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY
    BOTKIN, JR
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1995, 25 (05) : 32 - 39
  • [37] MATTERS OF PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY
    CHASE, HC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1977, 67 (11) : 1108 - 1109
  • [38] Confidentiality and privacy in healthcare
    English, Veronica
    Hamm, Danielle
    Harrison, Caroline
    Sheather, Julian
    Sommerville, Anne
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2006, 32 (06) : 372 - 372
  • [39] Privacy, Confidentiality, and Justice
    Francis, John G.
    Francis, Leslie P.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 45 (03) : 408 - 431
  • [40] PRIVACY, ETHICS, AND CONFIDENTIALITY
    SIEGEL, M
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 10 (02): : 249 - 258