Accurate Characterization for Continuous-Time Linear Equalization in CMOS Optical Receivers

被引:2
|
作者
Abdelrahman, Diaaeldin [1 ]
Atef, Mohamed [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Asyut 71515, Egypt
[2] United Arab Emirates Univ, Coll Engn, Elect & Commun Engn Dept, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2022年 / 10卷
关键词
Optical receiver; equalizer; transimpedance amplifier; noise; jitter; SENSITIVITY; GB/S;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3227934
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recently published CMOS optical receivers consist of a limited-bandwidth first-stage transimpedance amplifier (TIA) followed by an equalizer. Limiting the TIA's bandwidth improves the gain and reduces the noise but introduces a significant inter-symbol interference (ISI) that is dealt with by the subsequent equalizer. Continuous-time linear equalizer (CTLE) is a commonly used equalizer in both electrical and optical links. However, recent research reported different findings about CTLE-based optical receivers. Some research papers concluded that CTLEs boost high-frequency noise compared to a full-bandwidth design. Other publications reported that high-frequency noise remains unaffected while white noise is significantly reduced. This work aims to solve this discrepancy by presenting an accurate analysis for CTLE-based optical receivers considering noise, gain, and jitter. We show that the noise performance depends on the pole/zero locations of the limited-bandwidth (LBW)-TIA and the follow-on equalizer. A properly designed CTLE-based receiver achieves a 2.5x higher gain and a 1.74x better noise than the full-bandwidth design. The CTLE is also compared to the well-known decision feedback equalizer (DFE). The noise performance of the CTLE-based receiver lies between that of finite and infinite impulse response DFE-based receivers but achieves better gain than both architectures.
引用
收藏
页码:129019 / 129028
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Distributed Observer for a Continuous-Time Linear System
    Wang, Lili
    Liu, Ji
    Morse, A. Stephen
    [J]. 2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2019, : 86 - 89
  • [42] Observers of fractional linear continuous-time systems
    Kaczorek, Tadeusz
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CONTROL SCIENCES, 2022, 32 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [43] Controllability in Linear Continuous-Time Periodic Systems
    Zhou, Jun
    [J]. 2008 PROCEEDINGS OF SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2008, : 2165 - 2170
  • [44] COVARIANCE CONTROLLERS FOR LINEAR CONTINUOUS-TIME SYSTEMS
    SKELTON, RE
    IKEDA, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1989, 49 (05) : 1773 - 1785
  • [45] Continuous-time linear systems: Folklore and fact
    Sandberg, IW
    [J]. 2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 545 - 548
  • [46] IDENTIFICATION METHOD FOR LINEAR CONTINUOUS-TIME SYSTEMS
    Okou, Francis A.
    Nganga-Kouya, Donatien
    Amissanda, Arsene
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (ICCA), 2018, : 647 - 653
  • [47] Continuous-time linear systems: Folklore and fact
    Sandberg, IW
    [J]. CIRCUITS SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2002, 21 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [48] Realization of continuous-time positive linear systems
    vandenHof, JM
    [J]. SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1997, 31 (04) : 243 - 253
  • [49] Zeros of continuous-time linear periodic systems
    De Nicolao, G
    Ferrari-Trecate, G
    Pinzoni, S
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 1998, 34 (12) : 1651 - 1655
  • [50] Positive continuous-time linear Lyapunov systems
    Kaczorek, Tadeusz
    Przyborowski, Przemyslaw
    [J]. EUROCON 2007: THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AS A TOOL, VOLS 1-6, 2007, : 123 - 129