Measuring the economic benefits of designating Baegnyeong Island in Korea as a marine protected area

被引:11
|
作者
Kim, Joseph [1 ]
Lim, Seul-Ye [1 ]
Yoo, Seung-Hoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Baegnyeong Island; marine protected area; contingent valuation; economic benefit; willingness to pay; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONTINGENT; VALUATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2016.1232318
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Korean Government is considering designating Baegnyeong Island, which has several distinguishing features (it is the habitat of endangered species such as the spotted seal and has unique marine scenery and ecosystem), as a marine protected area (MPA). The policymakers are demanding information on the economic benefits of designating the island as an MPA. Therefore, this paper describes an attempt to measure the economic benefits, using a contingent valuation (CV) survey of 600 randomly selected households in Korea in 2015. We used a one-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice (DC) question to derive the willingness to pay (WTP) responses, and applied a spike model to deal with WTP responses of zero. The yearly mean WTP per household was computed to be KRW 3,590 (USD 3.15) for the next 10years, an estimate that is statistically significant at the 1% level. Expanding the value to the national population gives us KRW 67.2 billion (USD 59.1 million) per year. The present value of the total economic benefits amounts to KRW 534.0 billion (USD 469.2 million) using a social discount rate of 5.5%. We can conclude that Korean households are ready to shoulder some of the financial burden of designating the island as an MPA.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 213
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An evaluation of the social and economic impact of a Marine Protected Area on commercial fisheries
    Rees, Sian E.
    Ashley, Matthew
    Evans, Louisa
    Mangi, Stephen
    Sheehan, Emma V.
    Mullier, Tom
    Rees, Adam
    Attrill, Martin J.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2021, 235
  • [32] Are there economic benefits from marine protected areas? An analysis of scuba diver expenditure
    Saayman, Melville
    Saayman, Andrea
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2018, 19 : 23 - 39
  • [33] Flow of Economic Benefits From Coral Reefs in a Multi-Use Caribbean Marine Protected Area Using Network Theory
    Cavada-Blanco, Francoise
    Croquer, Aldo
    Yerena, Edgard
    Rodriguez, Jon P.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [34] Marine conservation in remote small island settings: Factors influencing marine protected area establishment in the Azores
    Abecasis, Rita Costa
    Longnecker, Nancy
    Schmidt, Luisa
    Clifton, Julian
    MARINE POLICY, 2013, 40 : 1 - 9
  • [35] Measuring the economic benefits of protecting the Tong River in Korea: a Contingent Valuation study
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    Kwak, Seung-Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2009, 39 (1-2) : 142 - 158
  • [36] Measuring progress in marine protection: A new set of metrics to evaluate the strength of marine protected area networks
    Roberts, Kelsey E.
    Valkan, Rebecca S.
    Cook, Carly N.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 219 : 20 - 27
  • [37] Foraging areas of king penguins from Macquarie Island in relation to a marine protected area
    Wienecke, B
    Robertson, G
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 29 (05) : 662 - 672
  • [38] EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF A MARINE PROTECTED AREA ON ROCKY INTERTIDAL MOLLUSCS IN WEH ISLAND, INDONESIA
    Hadiyanto, Hadiyanto
    Arbi, Ucu Yanu
    Juanda, Rian
    Subandi, Riyana
    Sjafrie, Nurul Dhewani Mirah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2022, 13 (01) : 307 - 320
  • [39] Nearshore species biodiversity of a marine protected area off Santa Catalina Island, California
    Looby, Audrey
    Ginsburg, David W.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2021, 81 (01) : 113 - 130
  • [40] Foraging Areas of King Penguins from Macquarie Island in Relation to a Marine Protected Area
    BARBARA WIENECKE
    GRAHAM ROBERTSON
    Environmental Management, 2002, 29 : 662 - 672