China-US trade flow behavior: the implications of alternative exchange rate measures and trade classifications

被引:12
|
作者
Cheung, Yin-Wong [1 ]
Chinn, Menzie D. [2 ,3 ]
Qian, Xingwang [4 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Econ & Finance, Int Econ, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Robert M La Follette Sch Publ Affairs, 1180 Observ Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Econ, 1180 Observ Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] SUNY Buffalo State, Econ & Finance Dept, 1300 Elmwood Ave, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA
关键词
Import; Export; Elasticity; Real exchange rate; Processing trade; BUSINESS CYCLES; RENMINBI; OVERVALUATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10290-015-0232-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors examine Chinese-US trade flows over the 1994-2012 period, and find that, in line with the conventional wisdom, the value of China's exports to the US responds negatively to real renminbi (RMB) appreciation, while imports respond positively. Further, the combined price effects on exports and imports imply an increase in the real value of the RMB will reduce China's trade balance. The use of alternative exchange rate measures and data on different trade classifications yields additional insights. Firms more subject to market forces exhibit greater price sensitivity. The price elasticity is larger for ordinary exports than for processing exports. Finally, accounting for endogeneity and measurement error matters. Hence, purging the real exchange rate of the portion responding to policy, or using the deviation of the real exchange rate from the equilibrium level yields a stronger measured effect than when using the unadjusted bilateral exchange rate.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 67
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Embodied carbon emissions in China-US trade
    Liu, Zhu
    Meng, Jing
    Deng, Zhu
    Lu, Ping
    Guan, Dabo
    Zhang, Qiang
    He, Kebin
    Gong, Peng
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2020, 63 (10) : 1577 - 1586
  • [22] Global impacts of China-US trade tensions
    Tam, Pui Sun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 29 (05): : 510 - 545
  • [23] China-US Trade Disputes in 2018: An Overview
    Lu, Feng
    [J]. CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2018, 26 (05) : 83 - 103
  • [24] China-US trade friction and welfare: The role of regional trade agreements
    Ding, Guanzu
    Guo, Guangyuan
    Wu, Caiyun
    Yu, Jiawen
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2022, 113
  • [25] GUEST EDITORIAL China-US Trade War
    Iqbal, Badar Alam
    [J]. GLOBAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS JOURNAL, 2020, 15 (11-12): : 505 - 507
  • [26] China-US Trade War and Its Future
    Yu Xiang
    [J]. Contemporary International Relations, 2018, 28 (05) : 55 - 65
  • [27] US FDI in China Has Widened China-US Trade Surplus
    杨来科
    廖春
    [J]. China Economist, 2007, (03) : 83 - 89
  • [28] Environmental and economic impacts of trade barriers: The example of China-US trade friction
    Liu, Li-Jing
    Creutzig, Felix
    Yao, Yun-Fei
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    Liang, Qiao-Mei
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 59
  • [29] The China-US Trade War and Future Economic Relations
    Duncan, Ron
    [J]. ASIAN-PACIFIC ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2020, 34 (01) : 84 - 85
  • [30] China-US trade: WTO will increase trade imbalance of paper and paper products
    Anon
    [J]. Papercast, 2000, (159):