Body Awareness: Construct and Self-Report Measures

被引:376
|
作者
Mehling, Wolf E.
Gopisetty, Viranjini
Daubenmier, Jennifer
Price, Cynthia J.
Hecht, Frederick M.
Stewart, Anita
机构
[1] Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
[2] Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
[3] Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
[4] Department of Psychosocial and Community Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
[5] Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Health and Aging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2009年 / 4卷 / 05期
关键词
IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LOW-BACK-PAIN; INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS; MINDFULNESS MEDITATION; EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCE; SOMATOSENSORY AMPLIFICATION; CORTICAL REORGANIZATION; ATTENTIONAL STRATEGIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0005614
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: Heightened body awareness can be adaptive and maladaptive. Improving body awareness has been suggested as an approach for treating patients with conditions such as chronic pain, obesity and post-traumatic stress disorder. We assessed the psychometric quality of selected self-report measures and examined their items for underlying definitions of the construct. Data sources: PubMed, PsychINFO, HaPI, Embase, Digital Dissertations Database. Review methods: Abstracts were screened; potentially relevant instruments were obtained and systematically reviewed. Instruments were excluded if they exclusively measured anxiety, covered emotions without related physical sensations, used observer ratings only, or were unobtainable. We restricted our study to the proprioceptive and interoceptive channels of body awareness. The psychometric properties of each scale were rated using a structured evaluation according to the method of McDowell. Following a working definition of the multi-dimensional construct, an inter-disciplinary team systematically examined the items of existing body awareness instruments, identified the dimensions queried and used an iterative qualitative process to refine the dimensions of the construct. Results: From 1,825 abstracts, 39 instruments were screened. 12 were included for psychometric evaluation. Only two were rated as high standard for reliability, four for validity. Four domains of body awareness with 11 sub-domains emerged. Neither a single nor a compilation of several instruments covered all dimensions. Key domains that might potentially differentiate adaptive and maladaptive aspects of body awareness were missing in the reviewed instruments. Conclusion: Existing self-report instruments do not address important domains of the construct of body awareness, are unable to discern between adaptive and maladaptive aspects of body awareness, or exhibit other psychometric limitations. Restricting the construct to its proprio-and interoceptive channels, we explore the current understanding of the multidimensional construct and suggest next steps for further research.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SELF-REPORT MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME
    CONTE, HR
    PLUTCHIK, R
    PICARD, S
    KARASU, TB
    VACCARO, D
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 29 (04) : 355 - 360
  • [22] IMAGERY ASSESSMENT BY SELF-REPORT AND BEHAVIORAL MEASURES
    DANAHER, BG
    THORESEN, CE
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1972, 10 (02) : 131 - &
  • [23] Readability of Self-Report Measures of Depression and Anxiety
    McHugh, R. Kathryn
    Behar, Evelyn
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 77 (06) : 1100 - 1112
  • [24] COMPARISON OF SELF-REPORT AND PROJECTIVE MEASURES OF DEPENDENCY
    EHRENREICH, JH
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1990, 66 (03) : 845 - 846
  • [25] Handling missing data in self-report measures
    Fox-Wasylyshyn, SM
    El-Masri, MM
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2005, 28 (06) : 488 - 495
  • [26] Self-report and biochemical measures of alcohol consumption
    Litten, RZ
    Fertig, J
    ADDICTION, 2003, 98 : III - IV
  • [27] READABILITY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT SELF-REPORT MEASURES
    PROUT, HT
    CHIZIK, R
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 56 (01) : 152 - 154
  • [28] EMPIRICAL CORRELATES OF SELF-REPORT DRINKING MEASURES
    BABOR, TF
    MENDELSON, JH
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 3 (02) : 167 - 167
  • [29] A Systematic Review of Self-Report Measures of Paranoia
    Statham, Verity
    Emerson, Lisa-Marie
    Rowse, Georgina
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 31 (02) : 139 - 158
  • [30] A COMPARISON OF INTERVIEW AND SELF-REPORT ALEXITHYMIA MEASURES
    PIERCE, MJ
    FARYNA, A
    DAVIDSON, A
    MARKART, R
    KRYSTAL, JH
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1989, 51 (02): : 254 - 255