Probabilistic Aspect Mining Model for Drug Reviews

被引:19
|
作者
Cheng, Victor C. [1 ]
Leung, C. H. C. [1 ]
Liu, Jiming [1 ]
Milani, Alfredo [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Kowloon 1234, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Perugia, Dept Math & Comp Sci, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
关键词
Drug review; opinion mining; aspect mining; text mining; topic modeling;
D O I
10.1109/TKDE.2013.175
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recent findings show that online reviews, blogs, and discussion forums on chronic diseases and drugs are becoming important supporting resources for patients. Extracting information from these substantial bodies of texts is useful and challenging. We developed a generative probabilistic aspect mining model (PAMM) for identifying the aspects/topics relating to class labels or categorical meta-information of a corpus. Unlike many other unsupervised approaches or supervised approaches, PAMM has a unique feature in that it focuses on finding aspects relating to one class only rather than finding aspects for all classes simultaneously in each execution. This reduces the chance of having aspects formed from mixing concepts of different classes; hence the identified aspects are easier to be interpreted by people. The aspects found also have the property that they are class distinguishing: They can be used to distinguish a class from other classes. An efficient EM-algorithm is developed for parameter estimation. Experimental results on reviews of four different drugs show that PAMM is able to find better aspects than other common approaches, when measured with mean pointwise mutual information and classification accuracy. In addition, the derived aspects were also assessed by humans based on different specified perspectives, and PAMM was found to be rated highest.
引用
收藏
页码:2002 / 2013
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A probabilistic rating inference framework for mining user preferences from reviews
    Cane Wing-ki Leung
    Stephen Chi-fai Chan
    Fu-lai Chung
    Grace Ngai
    [J]. World Wide Web, 2011, 14 : 187 - 215
  • [22] A probabilistic rating inference framework for mining user preferences from reviews
    Leung, Cane Wing-ki
    Chan, Stephen Chi-fai
    Chung, Fu-lai
    Ngai, Grace
    [J]. WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 14 (02): : 187 - 215
  • [23] A probabilistic model for surveillance video mining
    Dai, Ke-Xue
    Li, Guo-Hui
    Gan, Ya-Li
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2006, : 1144 - +
  • [24] A Probabilistic Model for Web Usage Mining
    David, Nicoleta
    Patrascu, Lucian
    Sasu, Adela
    Damian, Daniela
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS, 2009, : 129 - +
  • [25] A model-driven approach to aspect mining
    Department of Computer Science, Laboratory of Computer Science, University Badji Mokhtar of Annaba, B.P. 12, Annaba , Algeria
    不详
    [J]. Inf. Technol. J., 2006, 3 (573-576):
  • [26] Aspect Extraction for Opinion Mining with a Semantic Model
    Henriquez, Carlos
    Sanchez-Torres, German
    [J]. ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2021, 29 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [27] Resource Construction and Evaluation for Indirect Opinion Mining of Drug Reviews
    Noferesti, Samira
    Shamsfard, Mehrnoush
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [28] A Combination of Frequent Pattern Mining and Graph Traversal Approaches for Aspect Elicitation in Customer Reviews
    Nejad, Sepideh Jamshidi
    Ahmadi-Abkenari, Fatemeh
    Bayat, Pyman
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 151908 - 151925
  • [29] A novel deterministic approach for aspect-based opinion mining in tourism products reviews
    Marrese-Taylor, Edison
    Velasquez, Juan D.
    Bravo-Marquez, Felipe
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (17) : 7764 - 7775
  • [30] Aspect-based Opinion Mining for Code-Mixed Restaurant Reviews in Indonesia
    Suciati, Andi
    Budi, Indra
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASIAN LANGUAGE PROCESSING (IALP), 2019, : 59 - 64