Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and quantum steering in a three-mode optomechanical system

被引:72
|
作者
He, Qiongyi [1 ,2 ]
Ficek, Zbigniew [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Phys, State Key Lab Mesoscop Phys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] KACST, Natl Ctr Math & Phys, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2014年 / 89卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SEPARABILITY; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022332
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
We study multipartite entanglement, the generation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) states, and quantum steering in a three-mode optomechanical system composed of an atomic ensemble located inside a single-mode cavity with a movable mirror. The cavity mode is driven by a short laser pulse, has a nonlinear parametric-type interaction with the mirror and a linear beam-splitter-type interaction with the atomic ensemble. There is no direct interaction of the mirror with the atomic ensemble. A threshold effect for the dynamics of the system is found, above which the system works as an amplifier and below which as an attenuator of the output fields. The threshold is determined by the ratio of the coupling strengths of the cavity mode to the mirror and to the atomic ensemble. It is shown that above the threshold, the system effectively behaves as a two-mode system in which a perfect bipartite EPR state can be generated, while it is impossible below the threshold. Furthermore, a fully inseparable tripartite entanglement and even further a genuine tripartite entanglement can be produced above and below the threshold. In addition, we consider quantum steering and examine the monogamy relations that quantify the amount of bipartite steering that can be shared between different modes. It is found that the mirror is more capable for steering of entanglement than the cavity mode. The two-way steering is found between the mirror and the atomic ensemble despite the fact that they are not directly coupled to each other, while it is impossible between the output of cavity mode and the ensemble which are directly coupled to each other.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Steering paradox for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument and its extended inequality
    Feng, Tianfeng
    Ren, Changliang
    Feng, Qin
    Luo, Maolin
    Qiang, Xiaogang
    Chen, Jing-Ling
    Zhou, Xiaoqi
    [J]. PHOTONICS RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (06) : 992 - 1002
  • [22] AN EXTENSION OF THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    FRANSON, JD
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1981, 26 (04): : 531 - 531
  • [23] A RESOLUTION OF THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    MUCKENHEIM, W
    [J]. LETTERE AL NUOVO CIMENTO, 1982, 35 (09): : 300 - 304
  • [24] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and nonlocality in quantum dot systems
    Berrada, K.
    Eleuch, H.
    [J]. PHYSICA E-LOW-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS & NANOSTRUCTURES, 2021, 126
  • [25] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in a hybrid bipartite system
    Dabrowski, Michal
    Parniak, Michal
    Wasilewski, Wojciech
    [J]. OPTICA, 2017, 4 (02): : 272 - 275
  • [26] Dynamics of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering in Quantum Spin Environment
    W. F. Wang
    K. Wang
    W. W. Cheng
    [J]. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2019, 58 : 4069 - 4078
  • [27] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering paradox "2=1" for N qubits
    Liu, Zhi-Jie
    Zhou, Jie
    Meng, Hui-Xian
    Fan, Xing-Yan
    Xie, Mi
    Zhang, Fu-Lin
    Chen, Jing-Ling
    [J]. MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2024, 39 (09)
  • [28] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering testing via quantum measurement
    Shi, Jiadong
    Sun, Wen-Yang
    Wu, Tao
    [J]. LASER PHYSICS LETTERS, 2021, 18 (10)
  • [29] Application of three-mode Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen entangled state with continuous variables to teleportation
    Hu Li-Yun
    Lu Hai-Liang
    [J]. CHINESE PHYSICS, 2007, 16 (08): : 2200 - 2210
  • [30] Dynamics of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering in Quantum Spin Environment
    Wang, W. F.
    Wang, K.
    Cheng, W. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 58 (12) : 4069 - 4078