p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Cytology for Detection of Cervical Precancer in HPV-Positive Women

被引:142
|
作者
Wentzensen, Nicolas [1 ]
Fetterman, Barbara [2 ]
Castle, Philip E. [3 ,4 ]
Schiffman, Mark [1 ]
Wood, Shannon N. [1 ]
Stiemerling, Eric [2 ]
Tokugawa, Diane [2 ]
Bodelon, Clara [1 ]
Poitras, Nancy [2 ]
Lorey, Thomas [2 ]
Kinney, Walter [5 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, TPMG Reg Lab, Berkeley, CA USA
[3] Global Coalit Cerv Canc, Arlington, VA USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Med Care Program, Div Gynecol Oncol, Oakland, CA USA
来源
关键词
HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS DNA; CANCER PRECURSORS; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; PREDICTIVE VALUES; SCREENING-TESTS; FOLLOW-UP; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION; COLPOSCOPY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djv257
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening requires triage markers to decide who should be referred to colposcopy. p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology has been proposed as a biomarker for cervical precancers. We evaluated the dual stain in a large population of HPV-positive women. Methods: One thousand five hundred and nine HPV-positive women screened with HPV/cytology cotesting at Kaiser Permanente California were enrolled into a prospective observational study in 2012. Dual stain cytology was performed on residual Surepath material, and slides were evaluated for dual stain-positive cells. Disease endpoints were ascertained from the clinical database at KPNC. We evaluated the clinical performance of the assay among all HPV-positive women and among HPV-positive, cytology-negative women. We used internal benchmarks for clinical management to evaluate the clinical relevance of the dual stain assay. We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the dual stain compared with Pap cytology. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The dual stain had lower positivity (45.9%) compared with cytology at an ASC-US threshold (53.4%). For detection of CIN2+, the dual stain had similar sensitivity (83.4% vs 76.6%, P = .1), and statistically higher specificity (58.9% vs 49.6%, P < .001), PPV (21.0% vs 16.6%, P < .001), and NPV (96.4% vs 94.2%, P = .01) compared with cytology. Similar patterns were observed for CIN3+. Women with a positive test had high enough risk for referral to colposcopy, while the risk for women with negative tests was below a one-year return threshold based on current US management guidelines. Conclusion: Dual stain cytology showed good risk stratification for all HPV-positive women and for HPV-positive women with normal cytology. Additional follow-up is needed to determine how long dual stain negative women remain at low risk of precancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interobserver Reproducibility and Accuracy of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stain Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    Fetterman, Barbara
    Tokugawa, Diane
    Schiffman, Mark
    Castle, Philip E.
    Wood, Shannon N.
    Stiemerling, Eric
    Poitras, Nancy
    Lorey, Thomas
    Kinney, Walter
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 122 (12) : 914 - 920
  • [22] Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology
    Petry, K. Ulrich
    Schmidt, Dietmar
    Scherbring, Sarah
    Luyten, Alexander
    Reinecke-Luethge, Axel
    Bergeron, Christine
    Kommoss, Friedrich
    Loening, Thomas
    Ordi, Jaume
    Regauer, Sigrid
    Ridder, Ruediger
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (03) : 505 - 509
  • [23] Dual p16/Ki-67 Staining, Cytology and HPV Test after Conization
    Lorenz, Judith
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2023, 83 (05) : 483 - 483
  • [24] Clinical value of fully automated p16/Ki-67 dual staining in the triage of HPV-positive women in the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Program
    Ovestad, Irene T.
    Dalen, Ingvild
    Hansen, Elisabeth
    Loge, Janne L. D.
    Dybdahl, Britt Mona
    Dirdal, Marius B.
    Moltu, Pia
    Berland, Jannicke M.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 125 (04) : 283 - 291
  • [25] Evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual staining in detection of cervical precancer and cancers: a multicenter study in China
    Yu, Lu-Lu
    Chen, Wen
    Lei, Xiao-Qin
    Qin, Yu
    Wu, Ze-Ni
    Pan, Qin-Jing
    Zhang, Xun
    Chang, Bai-Feng
    Zhang, Shao-Kai
    Guo, Hui-Qin
    Qiao, You-Lin
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (16) : 21181 - 21189
  • [26] Triaging HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: Results from a sub-study nested into the ATHENA trial
    Wright, Thomas C., Jr.
    Behrens, Catherine M.
    Ranger-Moore, James
    Rehm, Susanne
    Sharma, Abha
    Stoler, Mark H.
    Ridder, Ruediger
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 144 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [27] Performance of p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology to detect anal precancer in the Anal Cancer Etiology and Screening (ACES) study
    Cohen, Camryn M.
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    Sigel, Keith
    Liu, Yuxin
    Gaisa, Michael
    Lewis, Emoni
    Clarke, Megan A.
    SEXUAL HEALTH, 2023, 20 (05) : LIII - LIII
  • [28] TRIAGING PAP NEGATIVE, HPV POSITIVE CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING TEST RESULTS BY P16/KI-67 DUAL STAINED CYTOLOGY
    Ridder, R.
    Luyten, A.
    Scherbring, S.
    Reinecke-Luettge, A.
    Schmidt, D.
    Petry, K. U.
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2010, 54 (03) : 404 - 405
  • [29] Application of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining cytology in cervical cancers
    Yu, Li
    Fei, Lingyan
    Liu, Xubin
    Pi, Xufang
    Wang, Liantang
    Chen, Shangwu
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (12): : 2654 - 2660
  • [30] Triage Strategies for Non-16/Non-18 HPV-Positive Women in Primary HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening: p16/Ki67 Dual Stain vs. Cytology
    Mazurec, Karolina
    Trzeszcz, Martyna
    Mazurec, Maciej
    Streb, Joanna
    Halon, Agnieszka
    Jach, Robert
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (20)