Nitrogen management systems to optimize spring wheat under no-till: Effects on plant development

被引:3
|
作者
Lafond, G. P.
Clayton, G. W.
Johnston, A. M.
May, W. E.
Derksen, D. A.
Stevenson, F. C.
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Indian Head, SK S0G 2K0, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
[3] Potash & Phosphate Potash Inst Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7K 5K2, Canada
[4] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Brandon, MB R7A 5Y3, Canada
关键词
Triticum aestivum L; nitrogen management; tiller development;
D O I
10.4141/P05-062
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Surface residues and standing stubble protect soil against erosion and mitigate against crop water deficits by conserving additional moisture. However, residues and stubble can also present a dilemma for producers practising no-till in terms of nitrogen (N) fertilizer management and row spacing. The objective of this research was to determine how row spacing, N management using urea and two rates of post-emergent herbicide (66 and 100% of recommended) affect spring wheat establishment and plant development. The study was conducted using a no-till system and a canola-spring wheat cropping system at three locations over a 3-yr period. The N management and row spacing treatments were (1) 23-cm row spacing with fall banded N on 30 cm; (2) 23-cm row spacing with spring banded N on 30 cm; (3) 30-cm row spacing with the N side-banded; (4) 23-cm row spacing with the N side-banded; and (5) sweep on 23-cm spacing with seed and fertilizer scattered over a 20-cm. width. Herbicide rates did not affect wheat development. Planting depth was greater for the sweep treatment, but only by 6 mm. Plant densities were at the low end of the optimal range of 200-250 plants m(-2) for all treatments and were least for the 30 cm row spacing. Average frequencies for tillers T0, T1, T2 and T3 were 20, 8161 and 10%, respectively. Fall and spring band treatments resulted in lower tiller frequencies than the sweep treatment, with intermediate levels for the side-band treatments. Tiller frequencies were identical between the 23-cm and 30-cm row spacings with N side-banded. Greater tiller frequencies for the sweep treatment likely resulted from the greater spread of seed, reducing inter-plant competition and closer proximity of the seed to fertilizer N. Spike density was not affected by N management. Expected spike density, calculated from tiller frequency and plant density data, was within 1% of the actual spikes recorded, when averaged over treatments. This means that tiller frequencies at the 5 to 5.5 leaf stage are a good predictor of expected spike density. Wider row spacings did not affect plant and tiller development but applying N fertilizer at time of seeding provided better spring wheat tiller development.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 451
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Nitrogen Fertilizer and Residue Management in Dryland No-Till Hard Red Spring Wheat
    Walsh, Olga S. S.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 2 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [3] Nitrogen and crop rotation effects on fusarium crown rot in no-till spring wheat
    Davis, Ryan A.
    Huggins, David R.
    Cook, R. James
    Paulitz, Timothy C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2009, 31 (04) : 456 - 467
  • [4] Nitrogen management - Nitrogen fertilization and rotation effects on no-till dryland wheat production
    Halvorson, AD
    Nielsen, DC
    Reule, CA
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (04) : 1196 - 1201
  • [5] Management Of Nitrogen Fertilizing Of Winter Wheat In No-Till Technology
    Esaulko, Alexander Nikolaevich
    Sigida, Maxim Sergeevich
    Golosnoy, Evgeny Valerievich
    Ozheredova, Alena Yurevna
    Korostylev, Sergey Aleksandrovich
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 9 (06): : 1916 - +
  • [6] Nitrogen and potassium fertilization in no-till hard red spring wheat production
    Walsh, Olga S.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [7] Spring wheat and canola response to nitrogen placement with no-till side band openers
    Johnston, AM
    Lafond, GP
    Hultgreen, GE
    Hnatowich, GL
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (01) : 191 - 198
  • [8] NITROGEN MANAGEMENT FOR ZERO-TILL SPRING WHEAT - DISPOSITION IN PLANT AND UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY
    CAMPBELL, CA
    SELLES, F
    ZENTNER, RP
    MCCONKEY, BG
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1993, 24 (17-18) : 2223 - 2239
  • [9] Crop sequence effects on leaf spot diseases of no-till spring wheat
    Krupinsky, Joseph M.
    Tanaka, Donald L.
    Merrill, Steven D.
    Liebig, Mark A.
    Lares, Michael T.
    Hanson, Jonathan D.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (04) : 912 - 920
  • [10] WHEAT RESIDUE LOSS FROM FIELDS UNDER NO-TILL MANAGEMENT
    STOTT, DE
    STROO, HF
    ELLIOTT, LF
    PAPENDICK, RI
    UNGER, PW
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1990, 54 (01) : 92 - 98