Minimally invasive compared with conventional thyroidectomy for nodular goitre

被引:22
|
作者
Dralle, Henning [1 ]
Machens, Andreas [1 ]
Phuong Nguyen Thanh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Fac Med, Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Visceral & Vasc Surg, D-06097 Halle, Germany
关键词
minimal neck incision thyroidectomy (MNIT); minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT); extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy (ESNT); nodular goitre; thyroid cancer; VIDEO-ASSISTED THYROIDECTOMY; ROBOTIC THYROIDECTOMY; PARATHYROID SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC THYROIDECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; NECK DISSECTION; DORSAL APPROACH; EXPERIENCE; LOBECTOMY; INCISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.beem.2013.12.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Since minimally invasive thyroidectomy was introduced in 1997, different surgical approaches to the thyroid have been described: the minimal neck incision and the anterior chest, areolar breast or axillary access. Whereas conventional open thyroidectomy is suitable for any thyroid disease, minimal neck incision thyroidectomy or extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy are limited to small-volume disease. In 11 prospective randomized studies and six systematic reviews, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy via a central or lateral neck approach afforded better cosmesis in the first 3 months than conventional open thyroidectomy, with less postoperative pain for the first 48 h. Surgical morbidity did not differ in these limited studies. No head-to-head comparison is available for extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy. Extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy caused more postoperative pain and gave rise to complications not seen with minimal neck incision thyroidectomy or conventional open thyroidectomy. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, conventional open thyroidectomy continues to remain the gold standard for any nodular goitre. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 599
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Will robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy improve patient outcomes compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy?
    Abe, Tetsuya
    Higaki, Eiji
    Fujieda, Hironori
    Saito, Hisafumi
    Narita, Kiyoshi
    Komori, Koji
    Ito, Seiji
    Shimizu, Yasuhiro
    MINI-INVASIVE SURGERY, 2023, 7
  • [22] Hypocalcemia After Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy
    Massick, Doug
    Garrett, Matthew R.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 : S121 - S121
  • [23] Hypocalcemia after minimally invasive thyroidectomy
    Massick, Doug
    Garrett, Matthew R.
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2014, 93 (09) : 414 - +
  • [24] Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: state of the art
    Miccoli, P.
    Minuto, M. N.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2009, 64 (06) : 545 - 548
  • [25] Minimally Invasive Thyroidectomy: A Review Article
    Chalam, Chanda Ramana
    Rao, K. Appa
    Praveen, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2015, 2 (10) : 108 - 111
  • [26] IONM and minimally invasive videoassisted thyroidectomy
    Del Rio, P.
    Cozzani, F.
    Nisi, P. C.
    Loderer, T.
    Piva, G.
    Bonati, E.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2018, 39 (05): : 291 - 296
  • [27] Cost analysis of minimally invasive compared to conventional mitral valve surgery
    Verbrugghe, Peter
    De Praetere, Herbert
    Meuris, Bart
    Regal, Filip
    Meyns, Bart
    Goodall, Gordon
    Hemmers, Paul
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2016, 71 (05) : 527 - 535
  • [28] Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy:: Is there any evidence-based information?
    Sgourakis, George
    Sotiropoulos, Georgios C.
    Neuhaeuser, Markus
    Musholt, Thomas J.
    Karaliotas, Constantine
    Lang, Hauke
    THYROID, 2008, 18 (07) : 721 - 727
  • [29] Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted versus Minimally Invasive Nonendoscopic Thyroidectomy
    Fik, Zdenek
    Astl, Jaromir
    Zabrodsky, Michal
    Lukes, Petr
    Merunka, Ilja
    Betka, Jan
    Chovanec, Martin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [30] Nodular goitre
    Hinton, JW
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1932, 95 : 499 - 502