Purchasing power parity in transition countries: Sequential panel selection method

被引:9
|
作者
He, Huizhen [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Tsangyao [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Financial Coll, Dept Investment & Insurance, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
关键词
Purchasing power parity; Real effective exchange rate; Transition countries; Sequential Panel Selection Method; Panel KSS unit root test; Fourier function; Policy implications; REAL EXCHANGE-RATES; UNIT-ROOT TEST; NONLINEAR ADJUSTMENT; TIME-SERIES; CENTURIES; TESTS; INTERVENTION; STATIONARITY; ECONOMIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.021
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study applies the Sequential Panel Selection Method (SPSM), proposed by Chortareas and Kapetanios (2009) to test the validity of long-run purchasing power parity (PPP) for a sample of 14 transition countries, using real effective exchange rates, from 1994 to 2012 (for both monthly and quarterly data). SPSM classifies the whole panel into a group of stationary series and a group of non-stationary series. In doing so, we can clearly identify how many and which series in the panel are stationary processes. Empirical results from the SPSM using the Panel KSS unit root test (Ucar and Omay, 2009) with a Fourier function indicate that PPP holds true for most of these transition countries studied. Our results have important policy implications for these transition countries under study. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 609
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An empirical test of the purchasing power parity for transition economies: Panel SURADF tests
    Lu, Yang-Cheng Ralph
    Chang, Tsangyao
    Lee, Kuei-Chiu
    Tzeng, Han-Wen
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2011, 18 (17) : 1691 - 1696
  • [22] Pitfalls in panel tests of purchasing power parity
    Peter Anker
    Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 1999, 135 : 437 - 453
  • [23] REVISITING REAL INTEREST RATE PARITY IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: THE SEQUENTIAL PANEL SELECTION METHOD
    Chang, Hsu-Ling
    ACTA OECONOMICA, 2014, 64 (02) : 181 - 196
  • [24] Pitfalls in panel tests of purchasing power parity
    Anker, P
    WELTWIRTSCHAFTLICHES ARCHIV-REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 1999, 135 (03): : 437 - 453
  • [25] Evidence on the purchasing power parity in a panel of cities
    Carrion-I-Silvestre, JL
    Del Barrio, T
    López-Bazo, E
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (09) : 961 - 966
  • [26] Revisiting purchasing power parity for 16 Latin American countries: panel SURADF tests
    Lu, Yang-Cheng Ralph
    Chang, Tsangyao
    Chiu, Chi-Chen
    Tzeng, Han-Wen
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2011, 18 (03) : 251 - 255
  • [27] Revisiting purchasing power parity for nine transition countries: a Fourier stationary test
    Lin, Su-Yuan
    Chang, Horng-Jinh
    Chang, Tsangyao
    POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2011, 23 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [28] TESTING PURCHASING POWER PARITY IN TRANSITION COUNTRIES: EVIDENCE FROM STRUCTURAL BREAKS
    Acaravci, Ali
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2010, 12 (27) : 190 - 198
  • [29] Purchasing power parity - nonlinear threshold unit root test for transition countries
    Liu, Siyue
    Zhang, Dongxiang
    Chang, Tsangyao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 19 (18) : 1781 - 1785
  • [30] THE VALIDITY OF PURCHASING POWER PARITY IN THE BRICS COUNTRIES
    Guris, Burak
    Tirasoglu, Muhammed
    PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2018, 27 (04): : 417 - 426