Evaluation of photobiomodulation therapy associated with guided bone regeneration in critical size defects. In vivo study

被引:16
|
作者
de Freitas, Nicole Rosa [1 ]
Guerrini, Luisa Belluco [1 ]
Esper, Luis Augusto [2 ]
Sbrana, Michyele Cristhiane [2 ]
Dalben, Gisele da Silva [3 ]
Soares, Simone [4 ]
Pompeia Fraga de Almeida, Ana Lucia [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Odontol Bauru, Posgrad Reabilitacao Oral, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Reabilitacao Anomalies Craniofaciais, Secao Periodontia, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Reabilitacao Anomalies Craniofaciais, Secao Odontopediat & Saude Colet, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Odontol Bauru, Dept Protese & Periodontia, Alameda Dr Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Autograft; Bone regeneration; Lasers; LEVEL LASER THERAPY; RAT; REPAIR; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0244
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The repair of bone defects raises the interest of investigators in several health specialties. Grafting techniques with bone substitutes and laser therapies have been investigated to replace autogenous bone and accelerate the bone healing process. Objective: To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) associated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in critical size defects. Material and Methods: The study was conducted on 80 male rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus, Wistar) submitted to surgical creation of a critical size defect on the calvaria, divided into eight study groups: group C (control - only blood clot); group M (collagen membrane); group PBMT (photobiomodulation therapy); group AB (autogenous bone); group AB+PBMT; group AB+M; group PBMT+M; group AB+PBMT+M. The animals were killed 30 days postoperatively. After tissue processing, bone regeneration was evaluated by histomorphometric analysis and statistical analyses were performed (Tukey test, p < 0.05). Results: All groups had greater area of newly formed bone compared to group C (9.96 +/- 4.49%). The group PBMT+M (achieved the greater quantity of new bone (64.09 +/- 7.62%), followed by groups PBMT (47.67 +/- 8.66%), M (47.43 +/- 15.73%), AB+PBMT (39.15 +/- 16.72%) and AB+PBMT+M (35.82 +/- 7.68%). After group C, the groups AB (25.10 +/- 16.59%) and AB+M (22.72 +/- 13.83%) had the smallest quantities of newly formed bone. The area of remaining particles did not have statistically significant difference between groups AB+M (14.93 +/- 8.92%) and AB+PBMT+M (14.76 +/- 6.58%). Conclusion: The PBMT utilization may be effective for bone repair, when associated with bone regeneration techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Ex vivo gene therapy in autologous critical-size craniofacial bone regeneration
    Chang, SCN
    Wei, FC
    Chuang, HL
    Chen, YR
    Chen, JK
    Lee, KC
    Chen, PKT
    Tai, CL
    Lou, JR
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 112 (07) : 1841 - 1850
  • [12] Critical-Size Defects of Animal Models for Bone Regeneration
    Lv, Zhao-Yong
    Chen, Xi-Meng
    Zhang, Yu-Jue
    Li, June
    Zhao, Zhong-Hui
    Li, Ke-Yi
    Xie, Guan-Nan
    Liu, Feng-Zhen
    Zhang, Bin
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2018, 8 (06) : 761 - 770
  • [13] Bone repair assessment of critical size defects in rats treated with mineralized bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) and photobiomodulation therapy: a histomorphometric and immunohistochemical study
    Letícia Cavassini Torquato
    Eduardo Antonio Chelin Suárez
    Daniella Viscensotto Bernardo
    Isis Luzcybel Ribeiro Pinto
    Ludmilla Oliveira Mantovani
    Thiago Igor Lemes Silva
    Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini
    Mauro Pedrine Santamaria
    Andrea Carvalho De Marco
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2021, 36 : 1515 - 1525
  • [14] Bone repair assessment of critical size defects in rats treated with mineralized bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) and photobiomodulation therapy: a histomorphometric and immunohistochemical study
    Torquato, Leticia Cavassini
    Chelin Suarez, Eduardo Antonio
    Bernardo, Daniella Viscensotto
    Ribeiro Pinto, Isis Luzcybel
    Mantovani, Ludmilla Oliveira
    Lemes Silva, Thiago Igor
    Neves Jardini, Maria Aparecida
    Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
    De Marco, Andrea Carvalho
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 36 (07) : 1515 - 1525
  • [15] Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of two types of bone substitutes in combination with i-PRF for bone regeneration in critical bone defects: An in vivo study
    Boia, J. Ribeiro de Albuquerque
    Soares, L. F. Ferreira
    Passos, G. P.
    Neves, J. dos Santos
    Mariano, R. Celio
    Junior, N. Vital Ribeiro
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2022, 14 (04) : 217 - 225
  • [16] Comparison of Bone Regeneration in Critical Size Calvarial Defects Utilizing Natural Materials and Growth Factors In Vivo
    Townsend, J. M.
    Dennis, S. C.
    Whitlow, J.
    Detamore, M. S.
    Berkland, C. J.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S166 - S166
  • [17] Clinical efficacy of guided bone regeneration in peri-implantitis defects. A network meta-analysis
    Ramanauskaite, Ausra
    Becker, Kathrin
    Cafferata, Emilio A. A.
    Schwarz, Frank
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2023, 93 (01) : 236 - 253
  • [18] In Vivo Evaluation of Permeable and Impermeable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina
    Gens, Natalia de Freitas
    de Brito Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo
    Neves Novellino Alves, Adriana Terezinha
    Cecato, Rafael Cury
    Uzeda, Marcelo Jose
    Granjeiro, Jose Mauro
    Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
    Calasans-Maia, Jose Albuquerque
    MEMBRANES, 2022, 12 (07)
  • [19] Mineralized Hydrogels Induce Bone Regeneration in Critical Size Cranial Defects
    Wu, Xinchen
    Zhang, Tengfei
    Hoff, Brianna
    Suvarnapathaki, Sanika
    Lantigua, Darlin
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Wu, Bin
    Camci-Unal, Gulden
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [20] A Novel Secretome Biotherapeutic Influences Regeneration in Critical Size Bone Defects
    Burdette, Alexander J.
    Guda, Teja
    Thompson, Michelle E.
    Banas, Richard
    Sheppard, Forest
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (01) : 116 - 123