Microfluidic technology for in vitro embryo production

被引:10
|
作者
Wheeler, MB [1 ]
Beebe, DJ [1 ]
Walters, EM [1 ]
Raty, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Anim Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
microfluidic; embryo; culture; maturation; livestock; porcine; in vitro production;
D O I
10.1109/MMB.2002.1002274
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the last decade the use of in vitro production of mammalian embryos and the utilization of assisted reproductive technologies such as embryo transfer, cryopreservation, and cloning are being used to produce genetically superior Livestock. However, efficiencies of these assisted reproductive technologies (ART's) are low. For these ART's to become more commercially viable, the efficiencies must improve. Despite this importance of reproduction for the livestock industry, little progress in decreasing embryonic mortality has been made. The livestock industry has succeeded in achieving large increases in average milk production of dairy cattle, growth rate in beef cattle and leanness in swine but reproductive efficiency has actually decreased. For example, research has provided little progress toward developing an objective method to examine viability of a single living embryo. At the same time, the growth of miniaturization technologies beyond integrated circuits and towards small mechanical systems has created opportunities for fresh examination of a wide range of existing problems. While the investigation and application of miniaturization technologies to medicine and biology is progressing rapidly, there has been limited exploration of microfabricated systems in the area of embryo production. We have taken a major step in demonstrating microfluidic systems for embryo manipulation and analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 108
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vitro embryo production protocols in Gir breed
    Ramos, A. A.
    Ferreira, A. M.
    Sa, W. F.
    Camargo, L. S. A.
    Viana, J. H. M.
    Henry, M. R. J. M.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2006, 58 (03) : 341 - 347
  • [32] Advances in Swine In Vitro Embryo Production Technologies
    Gil, M. A.
    Cuello, C.
    Parrilla, I.
    Vazquez, J. M.
    Roca, J.
    Martinez, E. A.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2010, 45 : 40 - 48
  • [33] Probing morphological, genetic and metabolomic changes of in vitro embryo development in a microfluidic device
    Mancini, Vanessa
    McKeegan, Paul J.
    Schrimpe-Rutledge, Alexandra C.
    Codreanu, Simona G.
    Sherrod, Stacy D.
    McLean, John A.
    Picton, Helen M.
    Pensabene, Virginia
    BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2021,
  • [34] A simplified microfabrication technology for production of glass microfluidic chips
    Yin, XF
    Hong, S
    Fang, ZL
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 31 (01) : 116 - 119
  • [35] Exploring human in vitro culture media for sheep in vitro embryo production
    Mara, L.
    Ebrahimi, M.
    Chessa, F.
    Angioi, A.
    Berlinguer, F.
    Dattena, M.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2024, 59
  • [36] In vitro embryo production and embryo transfer in domestic and non-domestic cats
    Pope, C. E.
    Gomez, M. C.
    Dresser, B. L.
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2006, 66 (6-7) : 1518 - 1524
  • [37] Oocyte related factors impacting on embryo quality: relevance for in vitro embryo production
    Nuttinck, Fabienne
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION, 2018, 15 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [38] Effect of Nellore bull variation on embryo in vitro production
    Lôbo, RB
    Watanabe, MR
    Vila, RA
    Galerani, MAV
    Watanabe, YF
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 1999, 51 (01) : 348 - 348
  • [39] Evolution of follicular aspiration for in vitro embryo production in ruminants
    Horacio, alvarez-Gallardo
    David, Urban-Duarte
    Eliab, Estrada-Cortes
    Fernando, Villasenor-Gonzalez
    Adriana, Velazquez-Roque
    ABANICO VETERINARIO, 2023, 14
  • [40] Influence of oocyte donor on in vitro embryo production in buffalo
    Gasparrini, B.
    Neglia, G.
    Di Palo, R.
    Vecchio, D.
    Albero, G.
    Esposito, L.
    Campanile, G.
    Zicarelli, L.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2014, 144 (3-4) : 95 - 101