EPOCK study protocol: a mixed-methods research program evaluating cancer care coordination nursing occupations in France as a complex intervention

被引:5
|
作者
Colombani, F. [1 ,2 ]
Sibe, M. [2 ,3 ]
Kret, M. [4 ]
Quintard, B. [5 ]
Ravaud, A. [1 ,6 ]
Saillour-Glenisson, F. [2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Grp Hosp St Andre, Bordeaux Univ Hosp, CHU Bordeaux, 3C, 1 Rue Jean Burguet, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[2] Ctr INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Populat Hlth, EMOS, INSERM, ISPED, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux, ISPED Bordeaux Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Populat Hlth, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[4] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Informat Med, Unite Soutien Methodol Rech Clin USMR, Pole Sante Publ, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[5] Univ Bordeaux, Fac Psychol, Lab EA 4136 Handicap Act Cognit Sante, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[6] CHU Bordeaux, Pole Cancerol, Med Oncol Serv, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[7] CHU Bordeaux, Pole Sante Publ, Serv Informat Med, Unite Methodes Evaluat Sante, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
关键词
Care coordination; Continuity of patient care; Patient care management; Patient-centered care; Theoretical framework; Models; Nurses; Neoplasms; Organisational context; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE; BREAST-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; PATIENT; CONTINUITY; COMMITMENT; SERVICES; ONCOLOGY; CANADA;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-019-4307-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundFacing the increasing cancer incidence and cancer survivorship, many national strategic cancer plans have identified cancer care coordination as a priority for health service improvement. However, the high variability of practices, the diversity of definitions and underlying concepts increases the existing difficulty to standardise, replicate, transpose and assess care coordination within the French health system context. The EPOCK national study aims at evaluating practices and the working context of hospital-based cancer care coordination nurses, based on a previously designed reference framework for care coordination within the French health system context.MethodsEPOCK is based on a comprehensive evaluation of nursing professions in cancer care coordination, considered as a complex intervention. Phase 1 (theoretical phase) will define and design a theoretical reference framework for care coordination in France through an international literature review, aiming to identify relevant models and all components of the expected framework and a structured consensus method, the Nominal group technique, aiming to select and prioritise the most relevant components already found in the literature review with regard to the French healthcare system; phase 2 (Operational phase) will consist in an in-depth analysis of practices, contexts, perceptions and attitudes related to care coordination occupations by nurses in oncology and all stakeholders (related professionals, patients and their caregivers) through a multicentric cross-sectional mixed-method evaluative study. The observed practices and contexts will be finally compared with the theoretical reference framework using both inductive and deductive approaches.DiscussionThis study will result in an evaluation framework identifying key models and key elements relative to cancer care coordination interventions that can be used to guide management of cancer care coordination nursing occupations within the French healthcare system. EPOCK would also assist in public decision-making to identify optimal targets, skills profiles and scope of actions for cancer coordination professions. Finally, EPOCK will describe typology of nurse practices in cancer care coordination and thus obtain precise preliminary information essential for drafting a medico-economic evaluation study of these new nursing professions' impact.Trial registrationClinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT03350776, 11/22/2017.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Development of a Health Literacy Program for Parents of Children with Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Bahrami, Masoud
    Eslami, Ahmad Ali
    Moafi, Alireza
    Sayahi, Somaye
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (12) : 1 - 6
  • [12] Validation of the instrument "Complexity of Nursing Care"-A mixed-methods study
    Huber, Evelyn
    Kleinknecht-Dolf, Michael
    Kugler, Christiane
    Mueller, Marianne
    Spirig, Rebecca
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2020, 7 (01): : 212 - 224
  • [13] Evaluating perceived barriers to optimal care in head and neck cancer: A mixed-methods study
    Powell, Steven Francis
    Beadle, Beth Michelle
    Watts, Tammara L.
    Maxwell, Jessica H.
    Hutkin-Slade, Linda
    Haynes-Lewis, Hilda
    Demirhan, Kimberly
    Plotkin, Elana
    Rush, Angie
    Dibble, Jacqueline
    Kim, Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [14] Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol
    Jenniches, Imke
    Lemmen, Clarissa
    Cwik, Jan Christopher
    Kusch, Michael
    Labouvie, Hildegard
    Scholten, Nadine
    Gerlach, Alexander
    Stock, Stephanie
    Samel, Christina
    Hagemeier, Anna
    Hellmich, Martin
    Haas, Peter
    Hallek, Michael
    Pfaff, Holger
    Dresen, Antje
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [15] EVALUATING IMPLEMENTATION FIDELITY TO A NURSE-LED CARE MODEL IN NURSING HOMES: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Guerbaai, Raphaelle Ashley
    De Geest, Sabina
    Simon, Michael
    Popejoy, Lori
    Wellens, Nathalie
    Denhaerynck, Kris
    Zuniga, Franziska
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 532 - 532
  • [16] Needs-based provision of medical care to nursing home residents: protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Czwikla, Jonas
    Schulz, Maike
    Heinze, Franziska
    Kalwitzki, Thomas
    Gand, Daniel
    Schmidt, Annika
    Tsiasioti, Chrysanthi
    Schwinger, Antje
    Kloep, Stephan
    Schmiemann, Guido
    Wolf-Ostermann, Karin
    Gerhardus, Ansgar
    Rothgang, Heinz
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [17] Stop Delirium! A complex intervention to prevent delirium in care homes: a mixed-methods feasibility study
    Siddiqi, Najma
    Young, John
    House, Allan O.
    Featherstone, Imogen
    Hopton, Ann
    Martin, Carol
    Edwards, Jill
    Krishnan, Rebecca
    Peacock, Rose
    Holt, Rachel
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2011, 40 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [18] Proactive cancer care in primary care: a mixed-methods study
    Kendall, Marilyn
    Mason, Bruce
    Momen, Natalie
    Barclay, Stephen
    Munday, Dan
    Lovick, Roberta
    MacPherson, Stella
    Paterson, Euan
    Baughan, Paul
    Cormie, Paul
    Kiehlmann, Peter
    Free, Amanda
    Murray, Scott A.
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 30 (03) : 302 - 312
  • [19] Evaluation of RuralkidsGPS; A Novel Integrated Paediatric Care Coordination Model of Care in Rural Australia - a Mixed-Methods Study Protocol
    Lingam, Raghu
    Smithers-Sheedy, Hayley
    Hodgson, Stephanie
    Hutchinson, Karen
    Morris, Tammy Meyers
    Hu, Nan
    Nassar, Natasha
    Schroeder, Elizabeth-Ann
    Rana, Rezwanul
    Dickins, Emma
    Bula, Kirsten
    Zurynski, Yvonne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2023, 23 (04):
  • [20] Mixed-methods research to evaluate a novel patient-centered cancer care coordination instrument.
    Okado, Izumi
    Cassel, Kevin
    Pagano, Ian
    Holcombe, Randall F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (27)