Evaluation of quantitative parameter of Q.Clear, a new image reconstruction algorithm for PET, compared with conventional iterative reconstruction

被引：0
|
作者：
Ishimori, T. [1 ]
Nakamoto, Y. [1 ]
Togashi, K. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Kyoto Univ, Kyoto, Japan
来源：
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING | 2016年 / 43卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
EP405
引用
收藏
页码：S388 / S389
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET always outperform image quality of OSEM-based reconstruction?
    Rogasch, J. M. M.
    Hofheinz, F.
    Suleiman, S.
    Lukas, M.
    Amthauer, H.
    Furth, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (SUPPL 1) : S781 - S781
  • [22] Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images
    Edgar Texte
    Pierrick Gouel
    Sébastien Thureau
    Justine Lequesne
    Bertrand Barres
    Agathe Edet-Sanson
    Pierre Decazes
    Pierre Vera
    Sébastien Hapdey
    EJNMMI Physics, 7
  • [23] Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Image Reconstruction (Q.Clear) in 82Rb Cardiac PET: Impact of Count Statistics
    Christensen, N.
    Tolbod, L. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 : S342 - S342
  • [24] Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a BGO PET/CT scanner
    Reynes-Llompart, Gabriel
    Gamez-Cenzano, Cristina
    Luis Vercher-Conejero, Jose
    Sabate-Llobera, Aida
    Calvo-Malvar, Nahum
    Marti-Climent, Josep M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (07) : 3214 - 3222
  • [25] Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images
    Texte, Edgar
    Gouel, Pierrick
    Thureau, Sebastien
    Lequesne, Justine
    Barres, Bertrand
    Edet-Sanson, Agathe
    Decazes, Pierre
    Vera, Pierre
    Hapdey, Sebastien
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [26] Q.Clear reconstruction optimization for digital PET: finding optimal balance between patient comfort, received dose and image quality
    Krizsan, A. K.
    Acs, A.
    Forgacs, A.
    Klagyvik, D.
    Garai, I.
    Szabo, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S693 - S694
  • [27] Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods in FDG-PET/CT Imaging
    Sezgin, C.
    Goksoy, D.
    Gumuser, G.
    Sayit, E.
    Parlak, Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2024, 51 : S943 - S944
  • [28] The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR
    Tian, Defeng
    Yang, Hongwei
    Li, Yan
    Cui, Bixiao
    Lu, Jie
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [29] The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR
    Defeng Tian
    Hongwei Yang
    Yan Li
    Bixiao Cui
    Jie Lu
    EJNMMI Physics, 9
  • [30] Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of 18F-fluciclovine PET for imaging of recurrent prostate cancer: semi-quantitative and clinical evaluation
    Teoh, Eugene J.
    McGowan, Daniel R.
    Schuster, David M.
    Tsakok, Maria T.
    Gleeson, Fergus V.
    Bradley, Kevin M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1085):
12345