Old structures, new relations: How community development credit unions define organizational boundaries

Studies of organizational dynamics examine the manner in which an organization's immediate environment defines the "rules and requirements to which individual organizations must conform in order to receive legitimacy and support" (Scott, 1992:132). In this paper we consider the question of how an organization can achieve legitimacy and support without necessarily compromising its organizational forms or practices to isomorphic pressures. We frame the question in terms of the boundaries between organizations and their environments. Where the population ecology studies show the survival value of adopting known organizational forms and practices, and neoinstitutionalism addresses the need to display compliance with accepted forms, our case study demonstrates the possibility of removing an organization or set of organizations from the familiar interaction by naming it as a :subfield of the organizational field, sharing the environment, but "out of the way" of predefined norms and practices.