Estimating survival and temporary emigration in the multistate capture-recapture framework

被引:157
|
作者
Schaub, M
Gimenez, O
Schmidt, BR
Pradel, R
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Div Conservat Biol, Inst Zool, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Schweiz Vogelwarte, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland
[3] CNRS, CEFE, F-34293 Montpellier, France
[4] Univ Zurich, Inst Zool, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Nat Hist Museum, KARCH, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
bias; Cormack-Jolly-Seber model; emigration; goodness-of-fit test; immigration; intrinsic identifiability; survival estimation;
D O I
10.1890/03-3110
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The open population Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) capture-mark-recapture model for estimating survival allows for random temporary emigration from the sampling area, but Markovian temporary emigration can bias estimates of survival. We explore a multistate capture-recapture model that has been proposed for coping with Markovian temporary emigration. We provide a comprehensive assessment of the performance of this model using computer algebra and simulation. We found that most model parameters were identifiable unless survival, emigration, and immigration were all time dependent. Simulation results showed that intrinsically identifiable parameters were estimated without bias and that precision of survival estimates was always high. When temporary emigration was Markovian, precision of estimates of emigration, immigration, and recapture probabilities was acceptable; otherwise it was not. Test component 2.Ct of the goodness-of-fit test for the CJS model had good power to detect Markovian temporary emigration. We conclude that the multistate model works well when temporary emigration is Markovian (i.e., when the CJS model should not be used) and when survival and recapture probabilities are high.
引用
收藏
页码:2107 / 2113
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adjusting multistate capture-recapture models for misclassification bias: Manatee breeding proportions
    Kendall, WL
    Hines, JE
    Nichols, JD
    ECOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) : 1058 - 1066
  • [42] A General Framework for Modeling Memory in Capture-Recapture Data
    Rouan, L.
    Choquet, R.
    Pradel, R.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2009, 14 (03) : 338 - 355
  • [43] Spatial Capture-Recapture
    Russell, Robin
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 (07): : 1319 - 1320
  • [44] Capture-recapture models
    Pollock, KH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) : 293 - 296
  • [45] CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS
    NICHOLS, JD
    BIOSCIENCE, 1992, 42 (02) : 94 - 102
  • [46] CAPTURE-RECAPTURE ESTIMATION
    DARROCH, JN
    RATCLIFF, D
    BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (01) : 149 - 153
  • [47] A flexible framework for spatial capture-recapture with unknown identities
    van Dam-Bates, Paul
    Papathomas, Michail
    Stevenson, Ben C.
    Fewster, Rachel M.
    Turek, Daniel
    Stewart, Frances E. C.
    Borchers, David L.
    BIOMETRICS, 2024, 80 (01)
  • [48] Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients
    Pradel, R
    Hines, JE
    Lebreton, JD
    Nichols, JD
    BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (01) : 60 - 72
  • [49] CAPTURE-RECAPTURE ANALYSIS
    HAMMERSLEY, JM
    BIOMETRIKA, 1953, 40 (3-4) : 265 - 278
  • [50] CAPTURE-RECAPTURE METHODS
    HOOK, EB
    REGAL, RR
    LANCET, 1992, 339 (8795): : 742 - 742