Effects of Changes in the Frankfort Horizontal Plane Definition on the Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Evaluation of Symmetry

被引:6
|
作者
Mangal, Utkarsh [1 ]
Hwang, Jae Joon [2 ]
Jo, Heon [1 ]
Lee, Sung Min [3 ]
Jung, Yun-Hoa [2 ]
Cho, Bong-Hae [2 ]
Cha, Jung-Yul [1 ,4 ]
Choi, Sung-Hwan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Inst Craniofacial Deform, Dept Orthodont, Coll Dent, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Inst Translat Dent Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Yangsan 50612, South Korea
[3] HDXWILL, Seoul 03162, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, PLUS Project BK21, Seoul 03722, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 22期
关键词
FH plane; cone-beam computed tomography; CBCT; facial asymmetry; imaging; three-dimensional; ASYMMETRY; LANDMARKS; DEVIATION; ACCURACY; LINE;
D O I
10.3390/app10227956
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The plane formed by the intersection of bilateral porions (PoR and PoL) and left orbitale (OrL) is conventionally defined as the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane. We aim to test the influence of the FH plane definition on a 3D cephalometric assessment. We selected 38 adult patients (20 males, 18 females; average age: 22.87 +/- 5.17 years) without any gross asymmetry from retrospective records and traced and analyzed their cone-beam computed tomographic images. The findings were categorized into the following four groups: FH1: conventional; FH2: PoR, PoL, right orbitale (OrR); FH3: OrR, OrL, PoL; FH4: OrR, OrL, PoR. The average menton (Me) deviation from the MSP was statistically significant for the FH1 group (0.56 +/- 0.27 mm; p < 0.001), compared to the FH3 (1.37 +/- 1.23 mm) and FH4 (1.33 +/- 1.16 mm) groups. The spatial orientation level (SOL) of the FH plane showed a marked difference (p < 0.05) between the FH2 (0.602 degrees +/- 0.503 degrees) and FH4 (0.944 degrees +/- 0.778 degrees) groups. The SOL of the MSP was comparatively small (p < 0.001) for FH2 (0.015 degrees +/- 0.023 degrees) in comparison to both FH 3 (0.644 degrees +/- 0.546 degrees) and FH 4 (0.627 degrees +/- 0.516 degrees). Therefore, the FH plane definition can significantly influence the interpretation of cephalometric findings. Future studies should focus on standardization to improve the reliability and reproducibility of 3D cephalometry.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Automated Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Identification
    Keustermans, J.
    Swennen, G.
    Mollemans, W.
    Schutyser, F.
    Vandermeulen, D.
    Suetens, P.
    XX CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF CRANIO-MAXILLO-FACIAL-SURGERY, 2010, : 45 - 48
  • [22] Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull
    Neelapu, Bala Chakravarthy
    Kharbanda, Om Prakash
    Sardana, Viren
    Gupta, Abhishek
    Vasamsetti, Srikanth
    Balachandran, Rajiv
    Sardana, Harish Kumar
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (02)
  • [23] Three-dimensional cephalometric superimposition of the nasomaxillary complex
    Lemieux, Genevieve
    Carey, Jason P.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Secanell, Marc
    Hart, Adam
    Dietrich, Nicholas
    Lagravere-Vich, Manuel O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 146 (06) : 758 - 764
  • [24] On three-dimensional mirror symmetry
    Dey, Anindya
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2012, (04):
  • [25] On three-dimensional mirror symmetry
    Anindya Dey
    Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012
  • [26] Three-dimensional evaluation of morphologic tooth symmetry in various malocclusions
    Dindaroglu, Furkan
    Duran, Gokhan Serhat
    Aras, Isil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 150 (03) : 459 - 466
  • [27] Pose Estimation of Three-Dimensional Face Point Cloud Based on Symmetry Plane
    Ma Zeqi
    Shi Zhiliang
    Li Xiaoyao
    Cai Wangyue
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2022, 59 (08)
  • [28] Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: An evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses
    Papadopoulos, MA
    Jannowitz, C
    Boettcher, P
    Henke, J
    Stolla, R
    Zeilhofer, HF
    Kovacs, L
    Erhardt, W
    Biemer, E
    Papadopulos, NA
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 33 (04) : 229 - 237
  • [29] Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking
    Dot, G.
    Rafflenbeul, F.
    Arbotto, M.
    Gajny, L.
    Rouch, P.
    Schouman, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (10) : 1367 - 1378
  • [30] Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review
    Pittayapat, P.
    Limchaichana-Bolstad, N.
    Willems, G.
    Jacobs, R.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2014, 17 (02) : 69 - 91