Effects of Changes in the Frankfort Horizontal Plane Definition on the Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Evaluation of Symmetry

被引:6
|
作者
Mangal, Utkarsh [1 ]
Hwang, Jae Joon [2 ]
Jo, Heon [1 ]
Lee, Sung Min [3 ]
Jung, Yun-Hoa [2 ]
Cho, Bong-Hae [2 ]
Cha, Jung-Yul [1 ,4 ]
Choi, Sung-Hwan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Inst Craniofacial Deform, Dept Orthodont, Coll Dent, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Inst Translat Dent Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Yangsan 50612, South Korea
[3] HDXWILL, Seoul 03162, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, PLUS Project BK21, Seoul 03722, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 22期
关键词
FH plane; cone-beam computed tomography; CBCT; facial asymmetry; imaging; three-dimensional; ASYMMETRY; LANDMARKS; DEVIATION; ACCURACY; LINE;
D O I
10.3390/app10227956
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The plane formed by the intersection of bilateral porions (PoR and PoL) and left orbitale (OrL) is conventionally defined as the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane. We aim to test the influence of the FH plane definition on a 3D cephalometric assessment. We selected 38 adult patients (20 males, 18 females; average age: 22.87 +/- 5.17 years) without any gross asymmetry from retrospective records and traced and analyzed their cone-beam computed tomographic images. The findings were categorized into the following four groups: FH1: conventional; FH2: PoR, PoL, right orbitale (OrR); FH3: OrR, OrL, PoL; FH4: OrR, OrL, PoR. The average menton (Me) deviation from the MSP was statistically significant for the FH1 group (0.56 +/- 0.27 mm; p < 0.001), compared to the FH3 (1.37 +/- 1.23 mm) and FH4 (1.33 +/- 1.16 mm) groups. The spatial orientation level (SOL) of the FH plane showed a marked difference (p < 0.05) between the FH2 (0.602 degrees +/- 0.503 degrees) and FH4 (0.944 degrees +/- 0.778 degrees) groups. The SOL of the MSP was comparatively small (p < 0.001) for FH2 (0.015 degrees +/- 0.023 degrees) in comparison to both FH 3 (0.644 degrees +/- 0.546 degrees) and FH 4 (0.627 degrees +/- 0.516 degrees). Therefore, the FH plane definition can significantly influence the interpretation of cephalometric findings. Future studies should focus on standardization to improve the reliability and reproducibility of 3D cephalometry.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks
    Dot, Gauthier
    Rafflenbeul, Frederic
    Kerbrat, Adeline
    Rouch, Philippe
    Gajny, Laurent
    Schouman, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [2] Landmarks of the Frankfort horizontal plane Reliability in a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system
    Hofmann, Elisabeth
    Fimmers, Rolf
    Schmid, Matthias
    Hirschfelder, Ursula
    Detterbeck, Andreas
    Hertrich, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2016, 77 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [3] Influence of different setups of the Frankfort horizontal plane on 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements
    Goncalves dos Santos, Rodrigo Mologni
    De Martino, Jose Mario
    Haiter Neto, Francisco
    Passeri, Luis Augusto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (02) : 242 - 249
  • [4] Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes
    Pittayapat, Pisha
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    Bornstein, Michael M.
    Odri, Guillaume A.
    Lambrichts, Ivo
    Willems, Guy
    Politis, Constantinus
    Olszewski, Raphael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 40 (03) : 239 - 248
  • [5] Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis
    Leung, M. Y.
    Leung, Y. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (08) : 1043 - 1051
  • [6] Theoretical Basis for Virtual Skull Orientation According to Three-Dimensional Frankfort Horizontal Plane for Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation
    Sonneveld, Keith A.
    Mai, Peter T.
    Hardigan, Patrick C.
    Portnof, Jason E.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (06) : 1902 - 1905
  • [7] A cephalometric study to establish the relationship of the occlusal plane to the three different ala-tragal lines and the Frankfort horizontal plane in different head forms
    Subhas, S.
    Rupesh, P. L.
    Devanna, R.
    Kumar, D. R. V.
    Paliwal, A.
    Solanki, P.
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 118 (02): : 73 - 77
  • [8] Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant
    Oh, Suseok
    Ahn, Jaemyung
    Nam, Ki-Uk
    Paeng, Jun-Young
    Hong, Jongrak
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2013, 39 (02) : 71 - 76
  • [9] Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile symmetry
    Duran, Gokhan S.
    Dindaroglu, Furkan
    Gorgulu, Serkan
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2017, 87 (01) : 96 - 103
  • [10] Parameterization of the three-dimensional room transfer function in horizontal plane
    Bu, Bing
    Abhayapala, Thushara D.
    Bao, Chang-chun
    Zhang, Wen
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 138 (03): : EL280 - EL286