Comparative study of algorithms for ECG segmentation

被引:50
|
作者
Beraza, Idoia [1 ]
Romero, Inaki [1 ]
机构
[1] IMEC Holst Ctr, Body Area Networks, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
ECG; Segmentation algorithms; Fiducial point's detection; WAVELET TRANSFORM; HOLTER ECG; DELINEATION; SIGNALS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bspc.2017.01.013
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Accurate automatic identification of fiducial points within an ECG is required for the automatic interpretation of this signal. Several methods exist in the literature for automatic ECG segmentation. These algorithms are based on different methodologies and often evaluated with different datasets and protocols, which makes their performance challenging to compare. For this study, nine segmentation algorithms were selected from the literature and evaluated with the same protocol in order to study their performance. One hundred signals from the PhysioNet's QT database were used for this evaluation. Results showed that one of the algorithms based in the discrete wavelet transform achieved sensitivity of 100% when detecting the onset and offset of the QRS complex. An algorithm using the Multi-scale Morphological Derivate achieved sensitivities of 99.81%, 98.17% and 99.56% when detecting the peak, onset and offset respectively of the P-wave. When segmenting the T-wave, an algorithm based on the Phasor transform had a good performance with sensitivities of 97.78%, 97.81% and 95.43% when detecting the peak, onset and offset, respectively. Additionally, probabilistic methods such as Hidden Markov Models had good results due to the fact that they can learn from real signals and adapt to specific conditions. However, these techniques are often computationally more complex and require training. This study could help in selecting optimal algorithms for ECG segmentation when implementing a system for automatic ECG interpretation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 173
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantum and classical genetic algorithms for multilevel segmentation of medical images: A comparative study
    Hilali-Jaghdam, Ines
    Ben Ishak, Anis
    Abdel-Khalek, S.
    Jamal, Amani
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 162 : 83 - 93
  • [22] Hashtag Segmentation: A Comparative Study Involving the Viterbi, Triangular Matrix and Word Breaker Algorithms
    Abd-hood, Samia F.
    Omar, Nazlia
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12 (04) : 311 - 318
  • [23] A comparative study of automatic image segmentation algorithms for target tracking in MR-IGRT
    Feng, Yuan
    Kawrakow, Iwan
    Olsen, Jeff
    Parikh, Parag J.
    Noel, Camille
    Wooten, Omar
    Du, Dongsu
    Mutic, Sasa
    Hu, Yanle
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (02): : 441 - 460
  • [24] A Comparative Study of Recent Real Time Semantic Segmentation Algorithms for Visual Semantic SLAM
    Javed, Zeeshan
    Kim, Gon-Woo
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND SMART COMPUTING (BIGCOMP 2020), 2020, : 474 - 476
  • [25] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TOPIC SEGMENTATION ALGORITHMS BASED ON LEXICAL COHESION: EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ON ARABIC LANGUAGE
    Harrag, Fouzi
    Hamdi-Cherif, Aboubekeur
    Al-Salman, Abdulmalik Salman
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 35 (2C) : 183 - 202
  • [26] On the combination of support vector machines and segmentation algorithms for anomaly detection: A petroleum industry comparative study
    Marti, Luis
    Sanchez-Pi, Nayat
    Molina Lopez, Jose Manuel
    Bicharra Garcia, Ana Cristina
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGIC, 2017, 24 : 71 - 84
  • [27] Comparative Evaluation of Two Segmentation Algorithms: Application on Liver Segmentation of CT Abdomen Images
    Thakur, Ritambhara
    Mittal, Deepti
    2016 1ST INDIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION PROCESSING (IICIP), 2016,
  • [28] Mesh segmentation -: A comparative study
    Attene, M.
    Katz, S.
    Mortara, M.
    Patane, G.
    Spagnuolo, M.
    Tal, A.
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SHAPE MODELING AND APPLICATIONS 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 14 - +
  • [29] Scout algorithms and genetic algorithms:: A comparative study
    Abbattista, F
    Carofiglio, V
    Köppen, M
    GECCO-99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 1999, : 769 - 769
  • [30] Comparative Testing of DNA Segmentation Algorithms Using Benchmark Simulations
    Elhaik, Eran
    Graur, Dan
    Josic, Kresimir
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2010, 27 (05) : 1015 - 1024