Impact of stereotactic body radiation therapy on geriatric assessment and management for older patients with head and neck cancer using G8

被引:4
|
作者
Gogineni, Emile [1 ]
Rana, Zaker [1 ]
Wotman, Michael [1 ]
Karten, Jessie [1 ]
Riegel, Adam [1 ]
Marrero, Mihaela [1 ]
Maduro, Luis [1 ]
Kamdar, Dev [2 ]
Frank, Douglas [2 ]
Paul, Doru [3 ]
Seetharamu, Nagashree [3 ]
Ghaly, Maged [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, Dept Radiat Med, Lake Success, NY USA
[2] Northwell Hlth, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Lake Success, NY USA
[3] Northwell Hlth, Dept Med Oncol, Lake Success, NY USA
关键词
Head neck; Cancer; Quality of life; SBRT; G8; Older; Elderly; Prognosis; Screening tool; MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEALTH-PROBLEMS; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SCREENING TOOLS; NATURAL-HISTORY; RECURRENT HEAD; LUNG-CANCER; REIRRADIATION; CETUXIMAB; COMORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2020.06.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Management of head and neck cancers (HNC) in older adults is a common but challenging clinical scenario. We assess the impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) on survival utilizing the Geriatric-8 (G8) questionnaire. Materials and methods: 171 HNC patients, deemed medically unfit for definitive treatment, were treated with SBRT systemic therapy. G8 questionnaires were collected at baseline, at 4-6 weeks, and at 2-3 months posttreatment. Patients were stratified according to their baseline G8 score: 11 as 'vulnerable', 11-14 as 'intermediate', and 14 as 'fit'. Overall survival (OS) was assessed through univariate Kaplan Meier analysis. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if baseline characteristics affected G8 score changes. Results: Median follow-up was seventeen months. 60% of patients presented with recurrent HNC, 30% with untreated HNC primaries, and 10% with metastatic non-HNC primaries. Median age was 75 years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 2.51% of patients were 'vulnerable', 37% were 'intermediate', and 12% were 'fit' at baseline, with median survival of 13.2, 24.3, and 41.0 months, respectively (p = .004). Patients who saw a decrease in their follow-up G8 score (n = 69) had significantly lower survival than patients who had stable or increased follow-up G8 scores (n = 102), with median survival of 8.6 vs 36.0 months (p < .001). Conclusion: The G8 questionnaire may be a useful tool in upfront treatment decision-making to predict prognosis and prevent older patients from receiving inappropriate anti-cancer treatment. Decline in follow-up G8 scores may also predict worse survival and aid in goals of care following treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 127
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimizing perioperative management of geriatric patients with head and neck cancer
    Shuman, Andrew G.
    Patel, Snehal G.
    Shah, Jatin P.
    Korc-Grodzicki, Beatriz
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (05): : 743 - 749
  • [42] Evaluation of the G8 screening tools for fraility in older patients with cancer
    Ogawa, Asao
    Nagashima, Fumio
    Hamaguchi, Tetsuya
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 : 119 - 119
  • [43] Geriatric Assessment as a Predictor of Tolerance, Quality of Life, and Outcomes in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancers and Lung Cancers Receiving Radiation Therapy
    VanderWalde, Noam A.
    Deal, Allison M.
    Comitz, Elizabeth
    Stravers, Lori
    Muss, Hyman
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Basch, Ethan
    Tepper, Joel
    Chera, Bhishamjit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 98 (04): : 850 - 857
  • [44] The significance of G8 and other geriatric assessments in urologic cancer management: A comprehensive review
    Yajima, Shugo
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 607 - 615
  • [45] The role of Geriatric screening tool (G8) in predicting side effect in older patients during therapy with aromatase inhibitor
    Dottorini, Lorenzo
    Catena, Laura
    Sarno, Italo
    Di Menna, Giandomenico
    Marte, Annamaria
    Novelli, Eugenio
    Rusca, Carmen
    Bajetta, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 10 (02) : 356 - 358
  • [46] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LUNG CANCER
    Bianchi, L. C.
    Beltramo, G.
    Brait, L.
    Bergantin, A.
    Locatelli, F.
    Fariselli, L.
    Gerosa, C.
    Mariani, P.
    Tabiadon, D.
    Locatelli, M. C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20
  • [47] Compliance to radiation therapy of head and neck cancer patients and impact on treatment outcome
    B. C. Ferreira
    P. Sá-Couto
    M. C. Lopes
    L. Khouri
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2016, 18 : 677 - 684
  • [48] Compliance to radiation therapy of head and neck cancer patients and impact on treatment outcome
    Ferreira, B. C.
    Sa-Couto, P.
    Lopes, M. C.
    Khouri, L.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 (07): : 677 - 684
  • [49] Risk of Xerostomia in Association With the Receipt of Radiation Therapy in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
    Liu, Chih-Chin
    Xia, Rui
    Guadagnolo, Ashleigh
    Cormier, Janice N.
    Du, Xianglin L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 18 (03) : 206 - 215
  • [50] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Science or Art?
    Garg, Rashi
    Mahmoud, Omar
    CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS, 2018, 14 (01) : 68 - 74