SOME CRITICAL REFLECTIONS TO PEER REVIEW SYSTEM IN ARABIC

Peer reviewing is the common way used for validating writings and requests of financing in order to measure and to test their property, possibility and strictness, etcetera; and, in spite of its failures, faults and mistakes, it seems the best way to get quality assurance for scientific publishing. Nevertheless, there are many people who are in disagreement with this methodology and criticize it from different points of view. This paper refers to some critical reflections about peer reviewing system and includes three conclusions. It has been possible thanks to the finance of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN).