Does energy research funding work? Evidence from the Natural Science Foundation of China using TEI@I method

被引:12
|
作者
Zhang, Ning [1 ]
Choi, Yongrok [2 ]
Wang, Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Dept Econ, 601 West Huangpu Ave, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Inha Univ, Dept Int Trade, 100 Inha Ro, Incheon 402751, South Korea
[3] Chaohu Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chaohu 238000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy use efficiency; Natural Science Foundation of China; Energy productivity growth; Innovation; CARBON EMISSION PERFORMANCE; FUEL POWER-PLANTS; MALMQUIST INDEX; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; CONSUMPTION; OUTPUTS; IMPACT; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Improving energy productivity is a top priority for China, and funding recearch projects may be an effective way to achieve the goal. Therefore, how to evaluate and find ways to enhance the promote effect of energy related research funding on energy productivity is urgent and meaningful. This paper uses the TEI@I method. In the first stage, we construct a total-factor energy productivity index (TEPI) based on the global non-radial directional distance function (GNDDF) and Malmquist index to illustrate the dynamic change of energy productivity growth for China during the period 2006-2015. We find that the TEPI shows a rising trend for most of the study period and is mainly driven by the technological progress. In the second stage, we use the econometric approach. The energy related research funding sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) has exerted remarkable positive effect on raising the TEPI and the technical progress in the process of energy use. We further propose some policy implications to enhance the promote effect of NSFC funding on raising the TEPI.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Does scientific and technological innovation promote regional coordination of socio-economy, environment, and energy? Evidence from quantitative research in China
    Zhang Z.
    Ding L.
    Zhu Y.
    Shi Y.
    Dai Q.
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2024, 58 (3) : 2735 - 2762
  • [22] Does the new energy demonstration cities construction reduce CO2 emission? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Hong Xu
    Baozhen Liu
    Lei Qiu
    Xujun Liu
    Weifen Lin
    Bei Liu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 50408 - 50426
  • [23] Does the new energy demonstration cities construction reduce CO2 emission? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Xu, Hong
    Liu, Baozhen
    Qiu, Lei
    Liu, Xujun
    Lin, Weifen
    Liu, Bei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (33) : 50408 - 50426
  • [24] Does the Energy-Consumption Permit Trading Scheme Improve Carbon Emission Performance? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
    He, Qi
    Jiang, Hongli
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [25] Does the renovation of waste-to-energy incineration plants attenuate the housing price gradient? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Shenzhen, China
    Song, Jinbo
    Nie, Rong
    Yuan, Hehui
    Gao, Jingxin
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 120
  • [26] How does new energy demonstration city pilot policy affect carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Gao, Xiulin
    Zhang, Guoxing
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Wei, Yigang
    Liu, Diyi
    Chen, Yidong
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 244
  • [27] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Does energy consumption, economic growth, urbanization, and population growth influence carbon emissions in the BRICS? Evidence from panel models robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity (Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2022), 29, 25, (37598-37616), 10.1007/s11356-021-17671-4)
    Chen, Hao
    Tackie, Evelyn Agba
    Ahakwa, Isaac
    Musah, Mohammed
    Salakpi, Andrews
    Alfred, Morrison
    Atingabili, Samuel
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1600,