Experimental soil dynamic force: An improvement of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) interpretation

被引:0
|
作者
Lukiantchuki, J. A. [1 ]
Bernardes, G. P.
Esquivel, E. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Geotech Engn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
关键词
standard penetration test; SPT; energy; soil dynamic reaction force;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is widely used for geotechnical subsurface investigation. It is intended to provide soil properties and foundation design parameters. Schnaid et al. (2009) proposed a rational method to assess the dynamic force (F-d), corresponding to the dynamic soil reaction to the sampler penetration, based on the amount of energy delivered to the sampler. This paper presents the results of SPT tests performed with two instrumented subassemblies, one placed at top and the other one at the bottom of the string of rods. This instrumentation allowed the assessment of the amount of energy transmitted to the string of rods, at sections just below the anvil and just above the sampler. Also, dynamic soil reaction forces were estimated through measurements of normal forces at a section just above the sampler. These reaction forces were then compared to the dynamic reaction forces estimated using the equation proposed by Schnaid et al. (2009). Results showed that experimental dynamic reaction values are lower than theoretical ones. However, it is possible to correct theoretical values using a multiplying factor, which can be evaluated from the amount of energy at top and bottom of the string of rods.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 872
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability analysis of soil liquefaction based on standard penetration test
    Jha, Sanjay K.
    Suzuki, Kiichi
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2009, 36 (04) : 589 - 596
  • [32] Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) records of a regressive barrier in southern Brazil
    Dillenburg, S. R.
    Barboza, E. G.
    Hesp, P. A.
    Rosa, M. L. C. C.
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2011, : 651 - 655
  • [33] Effect of spatial correlation of standard penetration test (SPT) data on bearing capacity of driven piles in sand
    Zhang, Lianyang
    Chen, Jin-Jian
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (04) : 394 - 402
  • [34] Geostatistical data analysis of the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) conducted in Maringa-Brazil and correlations with geomorphology
    de Freitas Luiz, Augusto Montor
    Maia Gutierrez, Nelci Helena
    SOILS AND ROCKS, 2020, 43 (04): : 619 - 629
  • [35] Improvement in the cervical mucus penetration test by using standard sperm control
    Yogev, L
    Gamzu, R
    Paz, G
    Kleiman, S
    Botchan, A
    Hauser, R
    Lessing, JB
    Yavetz, H
    ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 1999, 43 (03): : 253 - 257
  • [36] Experimental study on axial impacting force and hammer impacting energy in rod of heavy dynamic penetration test
    Shi L.
    Fu S.
    Yuan W.
    Han Y.
    Zhao M.
    Fu, Shaojun (shaojunfu69@vip.sina.com), 1600, Academia Sinica (35): : 201 - 208
  • [37] Recent developments in equipment and interpretation of cone penetration test for soil characterization
    Tonni, Laura
    Martinez, Maria Fernanda Garcia
    Rocchi, Irene
    ITALIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL-RIVISTA ITALIANA DI GEOTECNICA, 2019, 53 (01): : 71 - 99
  • [38] Experimental study on the measurement of dynamic penetration test hammer impacting energy by force-velocity method and force square method
    Shen Zhi-ping
    Liu Hui
    Fu Jun-yi
    Sun Xiu-dong
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2022, 43 (11) : 3127 - 3134
  • [39] Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Soil Using Standard Cone Penetration Test
    Lines, Scott
    Williams, David J.
    Galindo-Torres, Sergio A.
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES ON CLEAN ENERGY RESEARCH (ICACER 2017), 2017, 118 : 172 - 178
  • [40] Empirical Correlations with Standard Penetration Test (SPT)-N for Estimating Shear Wave Velocity Applicable to Any Region
    Sil A.
    Haloi J.
    International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2017, 3 (3)