Resolution times of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis

Objective: Lower extremity endovenous ablation has become the primary treatment modality for symptomatic venous reflux disease. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) has been reported as one of the primary complications of these venous ablative procedures. Our aim was to determine how long EHIT5 take to resolve and the factors affecting this length of time. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 10,029 consecutive procedures from March 2012 to September 2018 performed on 3218 patients who underwent endovenous ablation for lower extremity venous reflux. There were 6091 procedures performed with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 3938 with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). Post-procedural venous duplex ultrasound was performed to evaluate for EHIT and recanalization at 3 to 7 days, every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. JMP version 14 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analysis. Results: EH IT was found to have developed in 186 patients; 109 patients had been treated with RFA and 77 with EVLA. The average age of the patients receiving EVLA in whom EHIT developed was 59.97 +/- 11.61 years. The patients who received RFA and in whom EH IT developed had an average age of 73.4 +/- 9.64 years. The average time of resolution for the EVLA group was 75 +/- 71.97 days. The average resolution time for the RFA group was 139.8 +/- 232.52 days. There were no statistical differences between EHIT resolution times and age, sex, body mass index, clinical class, laterality, type of vein treated, or whether the patient was taking clopidogrel preoperatively or postoperatively. A statistical difference was found between EH IT resolution time and whether the patient was treated with EVLA or RFA (P = .0332). Conclusions: Our study seems to suggest that EHIT resolution times may be related to the difference in treatment modality between EVLA and RFA. The data suggest that EHIT resolves more quickly with the use of EVLA than with RFA.