The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice

被引:90
|
作者
Calvert, Melanie [1 ]
Brundage, Michael [2 ]
Jacobsen, Paul B. [3 ]
Schuenemann, Holger J. [4 ,5 ]
Efficace, Fabio [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Hlth & Populat Sci, MRC Midland Hub Trials Methodol Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Behav, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[4] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Biostat & Med, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[6] GIMEMA Data Ctr, Italian Grp Adult Hematol Dis GIMEMA, Head Hlth Outcomes Res Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy
来源
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Quality of life; CONSORT PRO; Reporting; Clinical trials; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MEDICAL JOURNALS; GUIDELINES; EDITORS; GRADE; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-11-184
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To inform clinical guidelines and patient care we need high quality evidence on the relative benefits and harms of intervention. Patient reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials can "empower patients to make decisions based on their values" and "level the playing field between physician and patient". While clinicians have a good understanding of the concept of health-related quality of life and other PROs, evidence suggests that many do not feel comfortable in using the data from trials to inform discussions with patients and clinical practice. This may in part reflect concerns over the integrity of the data and difficulties in interpreting the results arising from poor reporting. The new CONSORT PRO extension aims to improve the reporting of PROs in trials to facilitate the use of results to inform clinical practice and health policy. While the CONSORT PRO extension is an important first step in the process, we need broader engagement with the guidance to facilitate optimal reporting and maximize use of PRO data in a clinical setting. Endorsement by journal editors, authors and peer reviewers are crucial steps. Improved design, implementation and transparent reporting of PROs in clinical trials are necessary to provide high quality evidence to inform evidence synthesis and clinical practice guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Past and Current Practice of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    Efficace, Fabio
    Aaronson, Neil
    Calvert, Melanie
    Kyte, Derek
    Cottone, Francesco
    Cella, David
    Gamper, Eva-Maria
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (04) : 585 - 591
  • [42] Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study
    Kyte, Derek
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Keeley, Thomas
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Efficace, Fabio
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Turner, Grace
    Calvert, Melanie
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S35 - S35
  • [43] Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials
    Stephen Joel Coons
    Sonya Eremenco
    J. Jason Lundy
    Paul O’Donohoe
    Hannah O’Gorman
    William Malizia
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2015, 8 : 301 - 309
  • [44] Methods for Implementing and Reporting Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Measures of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Cancer Clinical Trials
    Basch, Ethan
    Rogak, Lauren J.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 38 (04) : 821 - 830
  • [45] Translation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology Clinical Trials to Everyday Practice
    Ivatury, Srinivas Joga
    Hazard-Jenkins, Hannah W.
    Brooks, Gabriel A.
    McCleary, Nadine J.
    Wong, Sandra L.
    Schrag, Deborah
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [46] Translation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology Clinical Trials to Everyday Practice
    Srinivas Joga Ivatury
    Hannah W. Hazard-Jenkins
    Gabriel A. Brooks
    Nadine J. McCleary
    Sandra L. Wong
    Deborah Schrag
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 65 - 72
  • [47] A systematic evaluation of compliance and reporting of patient-reported outcome endpoints in ovarian cancer randomised controlled trials: Implications for generalisability and clinical practice
    Mercieca-Bebber R.
    Friedlander M.
    Calvert M.
    Stockler M.
    Kyte D.
    Kok P.-S.
    King M.T.
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 1 (1)
  • [48] The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice and Clinical Decision Making
    Makhni, Eric C.
    Hennekes, Mary E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (20) : 1059 - 1066
  • [49] Systematic Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Content of Clinical Trial Protocols
    Kyte, Derek
    Duffy, Helen
    Fletcher, Benjamin
    Gheorghe, Adrian
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine
    Draper, Heather
    Ives, Jonathan
    Brundage, Michael
    Blazeby, Jane
    Calvert, Melanie
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [50] Surgeon Perceptions of the Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Practice
    Driscoll, Brittni
    Leonard, Laura D.
    Kovar, Alexandra
    Billings, Joshua
    Tevis, Sarah E.
    Kim, Simon P.
    Cumbler, Ethan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 280 : 486 - 494