Development engineering'' is a new interdisciplinary field that we define as creating solutions that improve human development at scale in low-resource settings. We posit that design thinking is the core of development engineering, but needs to be augmented for development applications to emphasize: (1) Incorporating development goals, constraints and opportunities; (2) Scaling for impact; and (3) Integration of novel sensors, experiments, and large datasets (e.g., from the Internet, satellites, and mobile phones). We used this framing of development engineering as the basis for a newly formed Ph.D. minor at UC Berkeley. This paper describes the foundational course in the program, elective courses and the theory and practice seminar. We provide lessons from our formative evaluation along with recommendations for improvement. [Levine, David I.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA; [Lesniewski, Martha A.] Univ Calif Berkeley, UC Berkeley UC San Francisco Grad Grp Bioengn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA; [Lesniewski, Martha A.] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA; [Agogino, Alice M.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mech Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA University of California System; University of California Berkeley; University of California System; University of California Berkeley; University of California System; University of California San Francisco; University of California System; University of California Berkeley Levine, DI (corresponding author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA. levine@berkeley.edu; marthal@berkeley.edu; agogino@berkeley.edu Agogino, Alice M./B-6970-2013 [Anonymous], ASME J MECH DESIGN; [Anonymous], 2013, The Economist; [Anonymous], 2013, WHAT IMPEDES EFFICIE; [Anonymous], 2013, HARVARD BUSINESS REV; Beckman S., 2007, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMEN, V50, P24; Beltramo T., 2014, J EC BEHAV ORG; Brown B.T., 2010, Stanford Social Innovation Review, P30, DOI [DOI 10.1108/10878571011042050, 10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29, DOI 10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29]; Brown T, 2008, HARVARD BUS REV, V86, P84; Brown T, 2009, BUS WEEK, P54; Calderon J., 2014, SOCIAL BLUEPRINT TOO; d.school Stanford University, 2014, TECHN DES THINK; Development Impact Lab, 2014, RUR EL POW PROJ; Dym CL, 2005, J ENG EDUC, V94, P103, DOI 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x; Fuge M., 2015, ASME J MECH DESIGN; Fuge M., 2014, P INT DES ENG TECHN; General Electric Co, 2013, ECONOMIST; Gordon P., 2014, ASME C EXP; Guiteras R., 2014, CREDIT CONSTRAINTS D; IDEO, 2015, FIELD GUID HUM CTR D; Khanna T.Palepu., 2010, Winning in emerging markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution, DOI DOI 10.1177/0974173920100316; Margolin V, 2007, DESIGN STUD, V28, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.008; Mattson C. A., 2013, P 2013 INT DES ENG T; Nieusma D, 2004, DES ISSUES, V20, P13, DOI 10.1162/0747936041423280; Oosterlaken I, 2009, DES ISSUES, V25, P91, DOI 10.1162/desi.2009.25.4.91; Papanek Victor., 1985, Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change; Perez Y., 2013, P FUT TRANSD DES TFT; Radjou N., 2014, TED TALK OCT; Roschuni C., 2011, P 18 INT C ENG DES I, V8; UC Berkeley, 2015, REQ DES EMPH DEV ENG; Water.org, 2015, MY LIF KIOSK OP; Wilson D., 2014, P TECHN DEV TECHN4 D; Winter A. G., 2006, INT J SERVICE LEARNI, V1, P2; Winter AG, 2013, INT DES ENG TECHN C; Wohlesn M., 2012, BIG DATA HELPS FARME; Woods A. E., 2014, P ASME 2014 INT DES 35 13 18 4 15 TEMPUS PUBLICATIONS DURRUS, BANTRY IJEE , ROSSMORE,, DURRUS, BANTRY, COUNTY CORK 00000, IRELAND 0949-149X INT J ENG EDUC Int. J. Eng. Educ 2016 32 3 B SI 1396 1406 11 Education, Scientific Disciplines; Engineering, Multidisciplinary Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S) Education & Educational Research; Engineering ED8UK 2024-02-21 WOS:000389146200010
J Levine, M Levine, Murray Sex and the Nursing Home AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY English Editorial Material [Levine, Murray] SUNY Coll Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA State University of New York (SUNY) System; Buffalo State College Levine, M (corresponding author), SUNY Coll Buffalo, Dept Psychol, 18 St Andrews Walk, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA. psylevin@buffalo.edu 0 1 2 0 2 AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC WASHINGTON 750 FIRST ST NE, WASHINGTON, DC 20002-4242 USA 0002-9432 1939-0025 AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT Am. J. Orthopsychiatr. 2016 86 3 355 359 10.1037/ort0000168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ort0000168 5 Psychiatry; Social Work Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Psychiatry; Social Work DN2XM 27196391 2024-02-21 WOS:000376926300010
J Levinson, KL; Jernigan, AM; Flocke, SA; Tergas, AI; Gunderson, CC; Huh, WK; Wilkinson-Ryan, I; Lawson, PJ; Fader, AN; Belinson, JL Levinson, Kimberly L.; Jernigan, Amelia M.; Flocke, Susan A.; Tergas, Ana I.; Gunderson, Camille C.; Huh, Warner K.; Wilkinson-Ryan, Ivy; Lawson, Peter J.; Fader, Amanda N.; Belinson, Jerome L. Intimate Partner Violence and Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening: A Gynecologic Oncology Fellow Research Network Study JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE English Article cervical cancer; screening; intimate partner violence; prevention; self sampling; barriers to healthcare PAP-SMEAR; WOMEN; HEALTH; PREVENTION Objectives The aims of the study were to examine barriers to cervical cancer screening among women who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) and accessed domestic violence shelters, to compare barriers among those up-to-date (UTD) and not UTD on screening, and to evaluate acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling. Materials and Methods This is a cross-sectional survey in which domestic violence shelters in Ohio were identified and women completed an anonymous survey assessing UTD screening status, barriers related to screening, history of IPV, intention to follow up on abnormal screening, and acceptability of self-sampling. Characteristics of UTD and not UTD women were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results A total of 142 women from 11 shelters completed the survey. Twenty-three percent of women were not UTD. Women who were not UTD reported more access-related barriers (mean = 2.2 vs 1.8; p = .006). There was no difference in reported IPV-related barriers between women who were not UTD and those who are UTD (mean = 2.51 in not UTD vs 2.24 in UTD; p = .13). Regarding future screening, of the women who expressed a preference, more women not UTD preferred self-sampling than UTD women (32% vs 14%; p = .05). Conclusions In this study, access-related barriers were more commonly reported among women not UTD with screening. Addressing these barriers at domestic violence shelters may improve screening among not UTD women. Self-sampling may also be one feasible approach to support screening in this population. [Levinson, Kimberly L.; Fader, Amanda N.] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Kelly Gynecol Oncol Serv, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA; [Jernigan, Amelia M.; Belinson, Jerome L.] Cleveland Clin, Womens Hlth Inst, Div Gynecol Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA; [Flocke, Susan A.; Lawson, Peter J.] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Family Med & Epidemiol & Biostat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA; [Tergas, Ana I.] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA; [Gunderson, Camille C.] Univ Oklahoma, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oklahoma City, OK USA; [Huh, Warner K.] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA; [Wilkinson-Ryan, Ivy] Washington Univ, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, St Louis, MO USA; [Belinson, Jerome L.] Prevent Oncol Int, Cleveland, OH USA Johns Hopkins University; Johns Hopkins Medicine; Cleveland Clinic Foundation; University System of Ohio; Case Western Reserve University; Columbia University; University of Oklahoma System; University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Birmingham; Washington University (WUSTL) Levinson, KL (corresponding author), Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, 600 N,Wolfe St,Phipps 281, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA. klevins1@jhmi.edu Foundation for Gynecologic Oncology from the Gynecologic Oncology Group entitled Improving Outcomes in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Research and Education Award; Behavioral Measurement Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center [P30 CA43703] Foundation for Gynecologic Oncology from the Gynecologic Oncology Group entitled Improving Outcomes in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Research and Education Award; Behavioral Measurement Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center The study was supported by a grant through the Foundation for Gynecologic Oncology from the Gynecologic Oncology Group entitled Improving Outcomes in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Research and Education Award and the Behavioral Measurement Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30 CA43703). Ackerson K, 2012, QUAL HEALTH RES, V22, P679, DOI 10.1177/1049732311424730; Adegoke O, 2012, J WOMENS HEALTH, V21, P1031, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2011.3385; Brown MJ, 2013, J WOMENS HEALTH, V22, P947, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2012.4222; Coker AL, 2000, J WOMEN HEALTH GEN-B, V9, P1015, DOI 10.1089/15246090050200051; Coker AL, 2007, TRAUMA VIOLENCE ABUS, V8, P149, DOI 10.1177/1524838007301162; Coker AL, 2009, J WOMENS HEALTH, V18, P1179, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2008.1048; Cronholm PF, 2009, J WOMENS HEALTH, V18, P1011, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2008.0968; Gandhi S, 2010, J AM BOARD FAM MED, V23, P343, DOI 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090124; Guvenc G, 2011, J ADV NURS, V67, P428, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05450.x; IBM, 2016, IBM SPSS STAT WINDOW; Newell S, 2000, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V90, P1431, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.90.9.1431; Sancho-Garnier H, 2013, INT J CANCER, V133, P2681, DOI 10.1002/ijc.28283; Saslow D, 2012, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V62, P147, DOI 10.3322/caac.21139; Scarinci IC, 2010, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V116, P2531, DOI 10.1002/cncr.25065 14 11 12 0 7 LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS PHILADELPHIA TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 USA 1089-2591 1526-0976 J LOW GENIT TRACT DI J. Low. Genit. Tract. Dis. JAN 2016 20 1 47 51 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000153 5 Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Obstetrics & Gynecology DA2AJ 26704329 Green Accepted 2024-02-21 WOS:000367597400010
J Levinson, N Levinson, Natasha A Levinasian Ethics for Education's Commonplaces: Between Calling and Inspiration STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION English Book Review [Levinson, Natasha] Kent State Univ, Kent, OH 44242 USA University System of Ohio; Kent State University; Kent State University Kent; Kent State University Salem Levinson, N (corresponding author), Kent State Univ, Kent, OH 44242 USA. nlevinso@kent.edu JOLDERSMA C, LEVINASIAN ETHICS ED 1 0 0 0 3 SPRINGER DORDRECHT VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS 0039-3746 1573-191X STUD PHILOS EDUC Stud. Philos. Educ. JAN 2016 35 1 113 117 10.1007/s11217-015-9498-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9498-8 5 Education & Educational Research; Philosophy Social Science Citation Index (SSCI); Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) Education & Educational Research; Philosophy DA2BY 2024-02-21 WOS:000367601500010
J Levinson, SC Levinson, Stephen C. Process and perish" or multiple buffers with push-down stacks?
