Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia by inferotemporal injection

被引:12
|
作者
Allman, KG
Barker, LL
Werrett, GC
Gouws, P
Sturrock, GD
Wilson, IH
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
[2] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, W England Eye Unit, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
关键词
surgery; ophthalmological; anaesthetic techniques; regional; peribulbar; anaesthetics local; articaine;
D O I
10.1093/bja/88.5.676
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Articaine is a novel amide local anaesthetic with a shorter duration of action than prilocaine. Methods. In a randomized, double-blind study we compared the efficacy of 2% articaine with epinephrine 1:200 000 with a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200 000 for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery using a single inferotemporal injection. Eighty-two patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive peribulbar anaesthesia with 6-7 ml of articaine or a bupivacaine/lidocaine mixture. Both solutions contained hyaluronidase 30 iu ml(-1). Ocular movement was scored at 2 min intervals up to 10 min, at the end of surgery and at time of discharge from hospital. Time to readiness for surgery and any complications (proptosis, chemosis, pain) were recorded. Results. The articaine group demonstrated a rapid onset of peribulbar block with mean time (sd) to readiness for surgery of 4.2 (4.5) min compared with 7.2 (5.7) min in the bupivacaine/lidocaine group (P=0.0095). The block obtained in the articaine group was dense with eye movement scores at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 min all significantly reduced (P<0.01 at each interval). There was also a faster offset of the block in the articaine group (P=0.0009). There was no difference in incidence of minor complications between the groups. Conclusions. Two per cent articaine is safe and effective for peribulbar anaesthesia by inferotemporal injection and is a suitable alternative to the traditional mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 678
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hyaluronidase as an adjuvant in bupivacaine-lidocaine mixture for retrobulbar/peribulbar block
    Kallio, H
    Paloheimo, M
    Maunuksela, EL
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (04): : 934 - 937
  • [32] The effects of volume and speed of injection in peribulbar anaesthesia
    Gillart, T
    Bazin, JE
    Montetagaud, M
    Bevillard, F
    Amara, S
    Schoeffler, P
    ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (05) : 486 - 491
  • [34] The efficacy and safety of 0.75% levobupivacaine vs 0.75% bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia
    Birt, DJ
    Cummings, GC
    EYE, 2003, 17 (02) : 200 - 206
  • [35] The efficacy and safety of 0.75% levobupivacaine vs 0.75% bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia
    D J Birt
    G C Cummings
    Eye, 2003, 17 : 200 - 206
  • [36] Peribulbar anaesthesia with 1% ropivacaine and hyaluronidase 300 IU ml-1:: comparison with 0.5%bupivacaine/2% lidocaine and hyaluronidase 50 IU ml-1
    Woodward, DK
    Leung, ATS
    Tse, MWI
    Law, RWK
    Lam, DSC
    Kee, WDN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (04) : 618 - 620
  • [37] A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF LIDOCAINE AND BUPIVACAINE
    SPIVEY, WH
    MCNAMARA, RM
    MACKENZIE, RS
    BHAT, S
    BURDICK, WP
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (07) : 752 - 757
  • [38] PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA - EFFECT OF BICARBONATE ON MIXTURES OF LIDOCAINE, BUPIVACAINE, AND HYALURONIDASE WITH OR WITHOUT EPINEPHRINE
    ZAHL, K
    JORDAN, A
    MCGROARTY, J
    SORENSEN, B
    GOTTA, AW
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 98 (02) : 239 - 242
  • [39] PERIBULBAR INJECTION OF - BUPIVACAINE FOR THE CONTROL OF PAIN AND NAUSEA IN VITREORETINAL SURGERY
    MABERLEY, DA
    KOZY, DW
    MABERLEY, AL
    SHEA, M
    GIAVEDONI, L
    PAOLINI, L
    WONG, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1995, 30 (06): : 317 - 319
  • [40] A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks
    Mikesell, P
    Nusstein, J
    Reader, A
    Beck, M
    Weaver, J
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2005, 31 (04) : 265 - 270