Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Misinformation Effects and Hindsight Bias

被引:12
|
作者
Calvillo, Dustin P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ San Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY | 2014年 / 141卷 / 04期
关键词
working memory capacity; individual differences; hindsight bias; misinformation effects; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; MISLEADING POSTEVENT INFORMATION; PREDICTS FALSE MEMORIES; EMBEDDED-FIGURES TEST; EYEWITNESS MEMORY; FIELD-DEPENDENCE; DISTORTION; IMAGERY; SUGGESTIBILITY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/00221309.2014.954917
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
ABSTRACT. The present study examined individual differences in susceptibility to two similar forms of memory distortion: the misinformation effect and hindsight bias. The misinformation effect occurs when individuals witness an event, are provided with misinformation, and recall the original event as containing elements of the misinformation. Hindsight bias occurs when individuals make judgments, are provided with feedback, and recall their original judgments as being more similar to the feedback than they actually were. Seventy-five participants completed a misinformation task, a hindsight bias task, and several individual difference measures related to memory distortions. Working memory capacity was negatively correlated with the misinformation effect and hindsight bias, and the misinformation effect and hindsight bias were negatively correlated with one another. Although the misinformation effect and hindsight bias are measured with similar designs, and both are predicted by working memory capacity, the negative correlation between them suggests these phenomena result from somewhat different processes.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 407
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Individual Differences in Timing of Susceptibility to Adverse Effects of Family Dysfunction
    Belsky, Jay
    Andersen, Signe H.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 36 (07) : 1229 - 1239
  • [32] Hindsight Bias and Law
    Giroux, Megan E.
    Coburn, Patricia I.
    Harley, Erin M.
    Connolly, Deborah A.
    Bernstein, Daniel M.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 224 (03): : 190 - 203
  • [33] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DISTRACTION
    BEE, HL
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1966, 23 (3P1) : 821 - &
  • [34] Individual differences in susceptibility to mindlessness
    Key, M. Scott
    Edlund, John E.
    Sagarin, Brad J.
    Bizer, George Y.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 46 (03) : 261 - 264
  • [35] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TO HYPNOSIS
    HILGARD, ER
    WEITZENHOFFER, AM
    GOUGH, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1958, 44 (12) : 1255 - 1259
  • [36] INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SUSCEPTIBILITY TO HYPNOSIS
    HILGARD, ER
    SCIENCE, 1958, 128 (3332) : 1145 - 1145
  • [37] ELIMINATING THE HINDSIGHT BIAS
    ARKES, HR
    FAUST, D
    GUILMETTE, TJ
    HART, K
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (02) : 305 - 307
  • [38] Auditory hindsight bias
    Bernstein, Daniel M.
    Wilson, Alexander Maurice
    Pernat, Nicole L. M.
    Meilleur, Louise R.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (04) : 588 - 593
  • [39] Hindsight Bias in Depression
    Gross, Julia
    Blank, Hartmut
    Bayen, Ute J.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 5 (05) : 771 - 788
  • [40] Decomposing Hindsight Bias
    Kelman M.
    Fallas D.E.
    Folger H.
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1998, 16 (3) : 251 - 269