SGPP: spatial Gaussian predictive process models for neuroimaging data

被引:17
|
作者
Hyun, Jung Won [1 ]
Li, Yimei [1 ]
Gilmore, John H. [2 ]
Lu, Zhaohua [4 ,5 ]
Styner, Martin [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Hongtu [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Biostat, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Comp Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Biomed Res Imaging Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Cokriging; Functional principal component analysis; Missing data; Prediction; Simultaneous autoregressive model; Spatial Gaussian predictive process; REGRESSION; MRI; CLASSIFICATION; APPROXIMATION; LIKELIHOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.018
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to develop a spatial Gaussian predictive process (SGPP) framework for accurately predicting neuroimaging data by using a set of covariates of interest, such as age and diagnostic status, and an existing neuroimaging data set. To achieve a better prediction, we not only delineate spatial association between neuroimaging data and covariates, but also explicitly model spatial dependence in neuroimaging data. The SGPP model uses a functional principal component model to capture medium-to-long-range (or global) spatial dependence, while SGPP uses a multivariate simultaneous autoregressive model to capture short-range (or local) spatial dependence as well as cross-correlations of different imaging modalities. We propose a three-stage estimation procedure to simultaneously estimate varying regression coefficients across voxels and the global and local spatial dependence structures. Furthermore, we develop a predictive method to use the spatial correlations as well as the cross-correlations by employing a cokriging technique, which can be useful for the imputation of missing imaging data. Simulation studies and real data analysis are used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of SGPP and show that SGPP significantly outperforms several competing methods, such as voxelwise linear model, in prediction. Although we focus on the morphometric variation of lateral ventricle surfaces in a clinical study of neurodevelopment, it is expected that SGPP is applicable to other imaging modalities and features. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 80
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gaussian process latent variable models for visualisation of high dimensional data
    Lawrence, ND
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 16, 2004, 16 : 329 - 336
  • [42] Active Data Based Gaussian Process Models for Nonlinear Spatiotemporal Systems
    Sun, Pei
    Xie, Lei
    Chen, Junghui
    2014 11TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA), 2014, : 6061 - 6066
  • [43] Efficient Computation of Gaussian Process Regression for Large Spatial Data Sets by Patching Local Gaussian Processes
    Park, Chiwoo
    Huang, Jianhua Z.
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2016, 17
  • [44] Non-Gaussian modeling of spatial data using scale mixing of a unified skew Gaussian process
    Zareifard, Hamid
    Khaledi, Majid Jafari
    JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2013, 114 : 16 - 28
  • [45] Gaussian Process Morphable Models
    Luthi, Marcel
    Gerig, Thomas
    Jud, Christoph
    Vetter, Thomas
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 40 (08) : 1860 - 1873
  • [46] Predicting the future of neuroimaging predictive models in mental health
    Tejavibulya, Link
    Rolison, Max
    Gao, Siyuan
    Liang, Qinghao
    Peterson, Hannah
    Dadashkarimi, Javid
    Farruggia, Michael C.
    Hahn, C. Alice
    Noble, Stephanie
    Lichenstein, Sarah D.
    Pollatou, Angeliki
    Dufford, Alexander J.
    Scheinost, Dustin
    MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 27 (08) : 3129 - 3137
  • [47] Generalized Gaussian Process Models
    Chan, Antoni B.
    Dong, Daxiang
    2011 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2011,
  • [48] ORTHOGONAL GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS
    Plumlee, Matthew
    Joseph, V. Roshan
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2018, 28 (02) : 601 - 619
  • [49] Predicting the future of neuroimaging predictive models in mental health
    Link Tejavibulya
    Max Rolison
    Siyuan Gao
    Qinghao Liang
    Hannah Peterson
    Javid Dadashkarimi
    Michael C. Farruggia
    C. Alice Hahn
    Stephanie Noble
    Sarah D. Lichenstein
    Angeliki Pollatou
    Alexander J. Dufford
    Dustin Scheinost
    Molecular Psychiatry, 2022, 27 : 3129 - 3137
  • [50] Predictive models avoid excessive reductionism in cognitive neuroimaging
    Varoquaux, Gael
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2019, 55 : 1 - 6