The G8 screening tool detects relevant geriatric impairments and predicts survival in elderly patients with a haematological malignancy

被引:105
|
作者
Hamaker, Marije E. [1 ]
Mitrovic, M. [2 ]
Stauder, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Diakonessen Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Internal Med Haematol & Oncol 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Elderly; Geriatric assessment; Prognostication; Haematological malignancy; RECEIVING INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; OLDER CANCER-PATIENTS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; GAIT SPEED; ADULTS; FEASIBILITY; TOXICITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00277-013-2001-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The G8 screening tool was developed to separate fit older cancer patients who were able to receive standard treatment from those that should undergo a geriatric assessment to guide tailoring of therapy. We set out to determine the discriminative power and prognostic value of the G8 in older patients with a haematological malignancy. Between September 2009 and May 2013, a multi-dimensional geriatric assessment was performed in consecutive patients aged a parts per thousand yen67 years diagnosed with blood cancer at the Innsbruck University Hospital. The assessment included (instrumental) activities of daily living, cognition, mood, nutritional status, mobility, polypharmacy and social support. In parallel, the G8 was also administered (cut-off a parts per thousand currency sign 14). Using a cut-off of a parts per thousand yen2 impaired domains, 70 % of the 108 included patients were considered as having an impaired geriatric assessment while 61 % had an impaired G8. The G8 lacked discriminative power for impairments on full geriatric assessment: sensitivity 69, specificity 79, positive predictive value 89 and negative predictive value 50 %. However, G8 was an independent predictor of mortality within the first year after inclusion (hazard ratio 3.93; 95 % confidence interval 1.67-9.22, p < 0.001). Remarkably, patients with impaired G8 fared poorly, irrespective of treatment choices (p < 0.001). This is the first report on the clinical and prognostic relevance of G8 in elderly patients with haematological malignancies. Although the G8 lacked discriminative power for outcome of multi-dimensional geriatric assessment, this score appears to be a powerful prognosticator and could potentially represent a useful tool in treatment decisions. This novel finding certainly deserves further exploration.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1040
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Elderly Patients with Hematological Malignancies By Two Different Geriatric Risk Scoring Systems: G8 and Flemish Version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST)
    Atilla, Erden
    Yalciner, Merih
    Kilic, Ozlem
    Muftuoglu, Nurhayat
    Atilla, Pinar Ataca
    Bozdag, Sinem Civriz
    Toprak, Selami Kocak
    Yuksel, Meltem Kurt
    Ozcan, Muhit
    Gurman, Gunhan
    Ilhan, Osman
    [J]. BLOOD, 2018, 132
  • [32] THE ROLE OF G8 SCREENING TOOL IN ELDERLY POPULATION UNDERGOING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
    Boschian, Riccardo
    Pavan, Nicola
    Verzotti, Enrica
    Silvestri, Tommaso
    Traunero, Fabio
    Liguori, Giovanni
    Trombetta, Carlo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E777 - E778
  • [33] IMPLEMENTING G8 SCREENING FOR EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF OLDER PATIENTS IN NEED OF COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT
    Delengowski, Anne
    Chapman, Andrew
    Lasota, Michelle
    Swartz, Kristine
    Thomas-Nembhard, Claudia
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2022, 49 (02) : E110 - E110
  • [34] EVALUATION OF THE G8 AND DEMENTIA SCREENING TOOLS FOR FRAILTY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH LUNG CANCER
    Agemi, Y.
    Misumi, Y.
    Sato, A.
    Ishii, M.
    Shimokawa, T.
    Hida, N.
    Okamoto, H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24
  • [35] Evaluation of the G8 Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Frailty in Older Cancer Patients (pts)
    Baitar, A.
    Vandebroek, A.
    De Droogh, E.
    Mebis, J.
    Schrijvers, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S275 - S275
  • [36] Validation of the G8 screening tool in older patients with cancer considered for surgical treatment
    Bruijnen, Cheryl P.
    Heijmer, Anne
    Van Harten-Krouwel, Diny G.
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    de Bree, Remco
    Witteveen, Petronella O.
    Emmelot-Vonk, Marielle H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (05) : 793 - 798
  • [37] Frailty screening in older patients with cancer in French Guiana: The limits of the G8 tool
    Joachim, Jean-Lionel
    Basset, Elisabeth
    Cenciu-Virjoghe, Beatrice
    Santa, Florin
    Albrand, Gilles
    Vernon, Diane
    Nacher, Mathieu
    Droz, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (02) : 253 - 255
  • [38] Usefulness of the G8 Screening Tool in Determining Treatment Strategies for Definitive Radiotherapy of Esophageal Cancer in the Elderly
    Nishibuchi, I.
    Murakami, Y.
    Miyoshi, S.
    Kubo, K.
    Katsuta, T.
    Imano, N.
    Nagata, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E165 - E165
  • [39] PREDICTIVE VALUE OF G8 SCREENING TOOL IN ELDERLY POPULATION UNDERGOING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
    Boschian, Riccardo
    Pavan, Nicola
    Verzotti, Enrica
    Silvestri, Tommaso
    Traunero, Fabio
    Liguori, Giovanni
    Trombetta, Carlo
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (04) : 2542 - 2542
  • [40] Relevance of G8 scale in referring elderly patients with aortic stenosis requiring a TAVI for a geriatric consultation
    de Thezy, Albane
    Lafargue, Aurelie
    d'Arailh, Lydie
    Dijos, Marina
    Leroux, Lionel
    Salles, Nathalie
    Rainfray, Muriel
    [J]. GERIATRIE ET PSYCHOLOGIE NEUROPSYCHIATRIE DE VIEILLISSEMENT, 2017, 15 (04): : 357 - 363