The G8 screening tool detects relevant geriatric impairments and predicts survival in elderly patients with a haematological malignancy

被引:105
|
作者
Hamaker, Marije E. [1 ]
Mitrovic, M. [2 ]
Stauder, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Diakonessen Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Internal Med Haematol & Oncol 5, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Elderly; Geriatric assessment; Prognostication; Haematological malignancy; RECEIVING INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; OLDER CANCER-PATIENTS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; GAIT SPEED; ADULTS; FEASIBILITY; TOXICITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00277-013-2001-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The G8 screening tool was developed to separate fit older cancer patients who were able to receive standard treatment from those that should undergo a geriatric assessment to guide tailoring of therapy. We set out to determine the discriminative power and prognostic value of the G8 in older patients with a haematological malignancy. Between September 2009 and May 2013, a multi-dimensional geriatric assessment was performed in consecutive patients aged a parts per thousand yen67 years diagnosed with blood cancer at the Innsbruck University Hospital. The assessment included (instrumental) activities of daily living, cognition, mood, nutritional status, mobility, polypharmacy and social support. In parallel, the G8 was also administered (cut-off a parts per thousand currency sign 14). Using a cut-off of a parts per thousand yen2 impaired domains, 70 % of the 108 included patients were considered as having an impaired geriatric assessment while 61 % had an impaired G8. The G8 lacked discriminative power for impairments on full geriatric assessment: sensitivity 69, specificity 79, positive predictive value 89 and negative predictive value 50 %. However, G8 was an independent predictor of mortality within the first year after inclusion (hazard ratio 3.93; 95 % confidence interval 1.67-9.22, p < 0.001). Remarkably, patients with impaired G8 fared poorly, irrespective of treatment choices (p < 0.001). This is the first report on the clinical and prognostic relevance of G8 in elderly patients with haematological malignancies. Although the G8 lacked discriminative power for outcome of multi-dimensional geriatric assessment, this score appears to be a powerful prognosticator and could potentially represent a useful tool in treatment decisions. This novel finding certainly deserves further exploration.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1040
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The G8 screening tool detects relevant geriatric impairments and predicts survival in elderly patients with a haematological malignancy
    Marije E. Hamaker
    M. Mitrovic
    R. Stauder
    [J]. Annals of Hematology, 2014, 93 : 1031 - 1040
  • [2] The G8 Screening Tool Detects Relevant Geriatric Impairments and Predicts Survival In Elderly Blood Cancer Patients
    Stauder, Reinhard
    Mitrovic, Martina
    Gastl, Guenther A.
    Hamaker, Marije E.
    [J]. BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [3] The G8 screening tool as an independent predictor of survival in elderly cancer patients
    Mennitto, A.
    Biello, F.
    Forti, L. G.
    Siffredi, G.
    Mahmoud, A. Mokhtar
    Invernizzi, F.
    Maggiora, P. M.
    Rua, A.
    Branni, C.
    Gioffi, E.
    Martini, V.
    Gobbato, S.
    Pisani, C.
    Ferrara, E.
    Cappelli, M.
    Catania, E.
    Ferrante, D.
    Gaidano, G.
    Krengli, M.
    Gennari, A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S1274 - S1274
  • [4] Validation of the G8 screening tool in older patients with aggressive haematological malignancies
    Velghe, Anja
    Petrovic, Mirko
    De Buyser, Stefanie
    Demuynck, Rein
    Noens, Lucien
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2014, 18 (06) : 645 - 648
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of the G8 screening tool for predicting survival in elderly patients with colon cancer
    Soler, G.
    Legido, R.
    Perez, X.
    Martinez-Villacampa, M.
    Santos, C.
    Losa, F.
    Ruffinelli, J. C.
    Mulet, N.
    Teule, A.
    Castany, R.
    Gallego, R.
    Carbonell, M.
    Manzana, A.
    Rios, A.
    Saldana, J.
    Salazar, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S457 - S457
  • [6] A Geriatric Screening Tool (G8) Provides an Independent Prognostic Index for Azacitidine Treated Elderly MDS Patients
    Molga, Angela
    Wall, Michelle
    Singhal, Deepak
    Chhetri, Rakchha
    Wee, Amilia
    Cussans, Lucy
    Singhal, Nimit
    Caughey, Gillian
    To, Luen Bik
    Bardy, Peter
    Shakib, Sepehr
    Lewis, Ian D.
    To, Timothy
    Hiwase, Devendra K.
    [J]. BLOOD, 2017, 130
  • [7] G8 as a screening tool for comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients with breast cancer.
    Grajales, Rocio
    Gutierrez Mata, Alicia
    Martinez Hernandez, Jose Enrique
    Zavala-Calderon, Alejandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [8] SURVIVAL OF ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER - PREDICTED BY PREOPERATIVE G-8 GERIATRIC SCREENING TOOL
    Anic, K.
    Altehoefer, C.
    Schmidt, M. W.
    Krajnak, S.
    Schwab, R.
    Linz, V.
    Westphalen, C.
    Hartmann, E. K.
    Schmidt, M.
    Hasenburg, A.
    Battista, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A83 - A83
  • [9] Is G8 geriatric assessment tool useful in managing elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma?
    Gebbia, Vittorio
    Mare, Marzia
    Cordio, Stefano
    Valerio, Maria Rosaria
    Piazza, Dario
    Bordonaro, Roberto
    Firenze, Alberto
    Giuffrida, Dario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01) : 163 - 167
  • [10] The preoperative G8 geriatric screening tool independently predicts survival in older patients with endometrial cancer: results of a retrospective single-institution cohort study
    Katharina Anic
    Christin Altehoefer
    Slavomir Krajnak
    Mona Wanda Schmidt
    Roxana Schwab
    Valerie Catherine Linz
    Marcus Schmidt
    Christiane Westphalen
    Erik Kristoffer Hartmann
    Annette Hasenburg
    Marco Johannes Battista
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 851 - 863