Auditory perception bias in speech imitation

被引:16
|
作者
Postma-Nilsenova, Marie [1 ]
Postma, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Commun & Informat Sci, Tilburg Ctr Cognit & Commun, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2013年 / 4卷
关键词
pitch; fundamental frequency; imitation; Heschl's gyrus; missing fundamental; PITCH PERCEPTION; HESCHLS GYRUS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PHONETIC CONVERGENCE; MUSICAL PITCH; SOCIAL-STATUS; COMMUNICATION; ACCOMMODATION; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00826
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In an experimental study, we explored the role of auditory perception bias in vocal pitch imitation. Psychoacoustic tasks involving a missing fundamental indicate that some listeners are attuned to the relationship between all the higher harmonics present in the signal, which supports their perception of the fundamental frequency (the primary acoustic correlate of pitch). Other listeners focus on the lowest harmonic constituents of the complex sound signal which may hamper the perception of the fundamental. These two listener types are referred to as fundamental and spectral listeners, respectively. We hypothesized that the individual differences in speakers' capacity to imitate F-0 found in earlier studies, may at least partly be due to the capacity to extract information about F-0 from the speech signal. Participants' auditory perception bias was determined with a standard missing fundamental perceptual test. Subsequently, speech data were collected in a shadowing task with two conditions, one with a full speech signal and one with high-pass filtered speech above 300 Hz. The results showed that perception bias toward fundamental frequency was related to the degree of F-0 imitation. The effect was stronger in the condition with high-pass filtered speech. The experimental outcomes suggest advantages for fundamental listeners in communicative situations where F-0 imitation is used as a behavioral cue. Future research needs to determine to what extent auditory perception bias may be related to other individual properties known to improve imitation, such as phonetic talent.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ROLE OF AUDITORY FEATURE DETECTORS IN PERCEPTION OF SPEECH
    TARTTER, VC
    EIMAS, PD
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1975, 18 (04): : 293 - 298
  • [32] Speech perception and the inferior frontal neural system for motor imitation
    Skipper, JI
    Nusbaum, HC
    Small, SL
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 170 - 170
  • [33] Modeling speech imitation and ecological learning of auditory-motor maps
    Canevari, Claudia
    Badino, Leonardo
    D'Ausilio, Alessandro
    Fadiga, Luciano
    Metta, Giorgio
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [34] Regressive spectral assimilation bias in speech perception
    Rysling, Amanda
    Jesse, Alexandra
    Kingston, John
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2019, 81 (04) : 1127 - 1146
  • [35] Regressive spectral assimilation bias in speech perception
    Amanda Rysling
    Alexandra Jesse
    John Kingston
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2019, 81 : 1127 - 1146
  • [36] The relationship of phonological ability, speech perception, and auditory perception in adults with dyslexia
    Law, Jeremy M.
    Vandermosten, Maaike
    Ghesquiere, Pol
    Wouters, Jan
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [37] Odors Bias Time Perception in Visual and Auditory Modalities
    Yue, Zhenzhu
    Gao, Tianyu
    Chen, Lihan
    Wu, Jiashuang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [38] Babbling and the lack of auditory speech perception: a matter of coordination?
    Koopmans-van Beinum, FJ
    Clement, CJ
    van den Dikkenberg-Pot, I
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2001, 4 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [39] Auditory and visual information in speech perception: A developmental perspective
    Taitelbaum-Swead, Riki
    Fostick, Leah
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2016, 30 (07) : 531 - 545
  • [40] Maturation of human auditory cortex: Implications for speech perception
    Moore, JK
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 111 (05): : 7 - 10