Variation in Use of Active Surveillance among Men Undergoing Expectant Treatment for Early Stage Prostate Cancer

被引:59
|
作者
Filson, Christopher P. [1 ]
Schroeck, Florian R. [2 ]
Ye, Zaojun [3 ]
Wei, John T. [3 ]
Hollenbeck, Brent K. [3 ]
Miller, David C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Urol Oncol, Dept Urol, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Div Hlth Serv Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2014年 / 192卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; SEER program; Medicare; physician's practice patterns; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CARE; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.105
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We examined variation in active surveillance use in Medicare eligible men undergoing expectant treatment for early stage prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Using SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) and Medicare data we identified 49,192 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 2004 through 2007. Of 7,347 patients who did not receive treatment (ie expectant management) within 12 months of diagnosis we assessed the prevalence of active surveillance (ie repeat prostate biopsy and prostate specific antigen measurement) vs watchful waiting across health care markets. We fit multivariable logistic regression models to examine associations of active surveillance with patient demographics, cancer severity and health care market characteristics. Results: During the study interval use of active surveillance vs watchful waiting increased significantly in patients treated expectantly from 9.7% in 2004 to 15.3% in 2007 (p < 0.001). Active surveillance was less common in older patients, those with high risk tumors and those with more comorbidities (each p < 0.001). Patients who were white and had higher socioeconomic status were more likely to receive active surveillance (each p < 0.05). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics significant differences in the predicted probability of active surveillance persisted across health care markets (range 2.4% to 30.1%). No significant variation in active surveillance use was associated with specific health care market characteristics, including intensity of end of life care, Medicare reimbursement or provider density. Conclusions: Active surveillance has been relatively uncommon in Medicare beneficiaries with localized prostate cancer. Its use relative to watchful waiting varies based on patient demographics, tumor severity and geographic location.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Re: Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Penson, David F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 153 - 153
  • [32] Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Voss, James
    Pal, Raj
    Ahmed, Shaista
    Hannah, Magnus
    Jaulim, Adil
    Walton, Thomas
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (06) : 863 - 870
  • [33] Statin use and time to progression in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Viranda H. Jayalath
    Madhur Nayan
    Antonio Finelli
    Maria Komisarenki
    Narhari Timilshina
    Girish S. Kulkarni
    Neil E. Fleshner
    Bimal Bhindi
    Andrew Evans
    Alexandre R. Zlotta
    Robert J. Hamilton
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2018, 21 : 509 - 515
  • [34] Statin use and time to progression in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Jayalath, Viranda H.
    Nayan, Madhur
    Finelli, Antonio
    Komisarenki, Maria
    Timilshina, Narhari
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Evans, Andrew
    Zlotta, Alexandre R.
    Hamilton, Robert J.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (04) : 509 - 515
  • [35] GERMLINE DNA DAMAGE REPAIR GENE MUTATIONS IN EARLY STAGE PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OR DEFINITIVE LOCAL TREATMENT
    Kearns, James T.
    Nielsen, Sarah M.
    Russell, Emily M.
    Moretz, Chad
    Esplin, Edward D.
    Korn, Michael
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E680 - E680
  • [36] Retrospective Review of Outcomes With Active Surveillance and Active Treatment for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Series
    Nicholson, C.
    Sathya, J.
    Kamran, A.
    Thoms, J.
    Gadag, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E217 - E217
  • [37] How widespread is active surveillance of early-stage prostate cancer in Japan? Multicenter questionnaire survey on the status of active surveillance of early-stage prostate cancer in Japan
    Kato, Takuma
    Tohi, Yoichiro
    Okazoe, Homare
    Taoka, Rikiya
    Ueda, Nobufumi
    Sugimoto, Mikio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (12) : 1438 - 1440
  • [38] Variation in the use of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Loeppenberg, Bjoern
    Friedlander, David F.
    Krasnova, Anna
    Tam, Andrew
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Barry, Hawa
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Menon, Mani
    Abdollah, Firas
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Sun, Maxine
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    CANCER, 2018, 124 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [39] TREATMENT TRENDS OF A LARGE ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COHORT FOR MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER
    Dinerman, Brian
    Baetzhold, Daniel
    Chevli, K. Kent
    Rutkowski, John
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E262 - E263
  • [40] Comparing PSA triggers for treatment for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance
    Loblaw, A.
    Zhang, L.
    Klotz, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 80 : S10 - S10