Mean ovarian diameter (MOD) as a predictor of poor ovarian response

被引:2
|
作者
Vladimirov, IK [1 ]
Tacheva, DM
Kalinov, KB
机构
[1] Med Ctr St Pantailemon, Div Reprod Med, Sofia, Bulgaria
[2] New Bulgarian Univ, Dept Psychol & Cognit Sci, Sofia, Bulgaria
关键词
COH; IVF; logistic model; MOD; poor response;
D O I
10.1023/B:JARG.0000027017.32027.df
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the predictive value of mean ovarian diameter of ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), in outcome with normal FSH level in early follicular phase of menstrual cycle. Methods: A prospective study established the prognostic value of the mean ovarian diameter of total 57 cases, including 17 patients undergoing IVF treatment with poor ovarian response and 40 patients ( control group) with adequate ovarian response. Results: The mean ovarian diameter ( MOD) of patients in the cancelled group was significantly lower (19.23 +/- 2.78) than in a comparable control group (24.67 +/- 3.38) [p < 0.001]. The mean ovarian diameter was a good predictor of poor ovarian response - area under receiver operating characteristic curve - ROCAUC = 0.88. The best criterion value discriminating between cancelled cycle and punctured was <= 20.6 mm. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that the mean ovarian diameter provides good prognostic information in outcomes with poor ovarian response during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF. The test is easy to perform and it is a good informative resource.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 77
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Follicle stimulating hormone as a predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF
    Ashrafi, M
    Madani, T
    Tehranian, AS
    Malekzadeh, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 91 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [32] What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF?
    Vaiarelli, Alberto
    Cimadomo, Danilo
    Ubaldi, Nicolo
    Rienzi, Laura
    Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 30 (03) : 155 - 162
  • [33] The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment
    Giannelou, Polina
    Simopoulou, Mara
    Grigoriadis, Sokratis
    Makrakis, Evangelos
    Kontogeorgi, Adamantia
    Pantou, Agni
    Galatis, Dionysios
    Kalampokas, Theodoros
    Bakas, Panagiotis
    Bolaris, Stamatis
    Pantos, Konstantinos
    Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (09)
  • [34] Acupuncture for Poor Ovarian Response: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kim, Jihyun
    Lee, Hoyoung
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Kim, Joong Il
    Kang, Byoung-Kab
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Joo, Jong Kil
    Lee, Kyu Sup
    You, Sooseong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [35] ANDROGEN RECEPTOR POLYMORPHISMS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH POOR OVARIAN RESPONSE
    Llacer, J.
    Ortiz, J. A.
    Guerrero, J.
    Lledo, B.
    Ten, J.
    Bernabeu, R.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (03) : S114 - S114
  • [36] In search of a new biomarker to predict poor ovarian response
    Forman, Eric J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 113 (06) : 1157 - 1157
  • [37] Evidence-based management of poor ovarian response
    Venetis, Christos A.
    Kolibianakis, Efstratios M.
    Tarlatzi, Theoni B.
    Tarlatzis, Basil C.
    WOMEN'S HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2010, 1205 : 199 - 206
  • [38] Involvement of single nucleotide polymorphisms in ovarian poor response
    Ghaderian, Sayyed Mohammad Hossein
    Akbarzadeh, Reza
    Salehpour, Saghar
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (09) : 2405 - 2413
  • [39] The risk of poor ovarian response during repeat IVF
    Papathanasiou, Athanasios
    Mawal, Nausheen
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 42 (04) : 742 - 747
  • [40] Cumulative pregnancy rates in women with poor ovarian response
    Goldfarb, James M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (06) : 1004 - 1005